Iraq Slaughter Not An Aberration

By Glenn Greenwald

April 06, 2010 "Salon" --  I was just on Democracy Now along with WikiLeaks' 
Julian Assange discussing the Iraq video they released yesterday, and there's 
one vital point I want to emphasize.  Shining light on what our government and 
military do is so critical precisely because it forces people to see what is 
really being done and prevents myth and propaganda from distorting those 
realities.  That's why the administration fights so hard to keep torture photos 
suppressed, why the military fought so hard here to keep this video 
concealed (and why they did the same with regard to the Afghan massacre), and 
why whistle-blowers, real journalists, and sites like WikiLeaks are the 
declared enemy of the government.  The discussions many people are having today 
-- about the brutal reality of what the U.S. does when it engages in war, 
invasions and occupation -- is exactly the discussion which they most want to 
avoid. 
But there's a serious danger when incidents like this Iraq slaughter are 
exposed in a piecemeal and unusual fashion:  namely, the tendency to talk about 
it as though it is an aberration.  It isn't.  It's the opposite:  it's par for 
the course, standard operating procedure, what we do in wars, invasions, and 
occupation.  The only thing that's rare about the Apache helicopter killings is 
that we know about it and are seeing what happened on video.  And we're seeing 
it on video not because it's rare, but because it just so happened (a) to 
result in the deaths of two Reuters employees, and thus received more attention 
than the thousands of other similar incidents where nameless Iraqi civilians 
are killed, and (b) to end up in the hands of WikiLeaks, which then published 
it.  But what is shown is completely common.  That includes not only the 
initial killing of a group of men, the vast majority of whom are clearly 
unarmed, but also the plainly
 unjustified killing of a group of unarmed men (with their children) carrying 
away an unarmed, seriously wounded man to safety -- as though there's something 
nefarious about human beings in an urban area trying to take an unarmed, 
wounded photographer to a hospital.
A major reason there are hundreds of thousands of dead innocent civilians in 
Iraq, and thousands more in Afghanistan, is because this is what we do.  This 
is why so many of those civilians are dead.  What one sees on that video is how 
we conduct our wars.  That's why it's repulsive to watch people -- including 
some "liberals" -- attack WikiLeaks for slandering The Troops, or complain that 
objections to these actions unfairly disparage the military because "our guys 
are the good guys" and they act differently "99.99999999% of the time."  That 
is blatantly false.  Just as was true of the deceitful attempt to depict the 
Abu Ghraib abusers as rogue "bad apples" once their conduct was exposed with 
photographs (when the reality was they were acting in complete consistency with 
authorized government policy), the claim that what was shown on that video is 
some sort of outrageous departure from U.S. policy is demonstrably false.  In a 
perverse way, the
 typical morally depraved neocons who are justifying these killings are 
actually being more honest than those trying to pretend this is some sort of 
rare and unusual event:  those who support having the U.S. invade and wage war 
on other countries are endorsing precisely this behavior.
As the video demonstrates, the soldiers in the Apache did not take a single 
step -- including killing those unarmed men who tried to rescue the wounded -- 
without first receiving formal permission from their superiors.  Beyond that, 
the Pentagon yesterday -- once the video was released -- suddenly embraced the 
wisdom of transparency by posting online the reports of the 
so-called "investigations" it undertook into this incident (as a result of 
pressure from Reuters).   Those formal investigations not only found that every 
action taken by those soldiers was completely justified -- including the firing 
on the unarmed civilian rescuers -- but also found that there's no need for any 
remedial steps to be taken to prevent future re-occurence.  What we see on that 
video is what the U.S. does on a constant and regular basis in these countries, 
and it's what we've been doing for years.  It's obviously consistent with our 
policies and practices for how we
 fight in these countries, which is exactly what those investigative reports 
concluded.
The WikiLeaks video is not an indictment of the individual soldiers involved -- 
at least not primarily.  Of course those who aren't accustomed to such 
sentiments are shocked by the callous and sadistic satisfaction those soldiers 
seem to take in slaughtering those whom they perceive as The Enemy (even when 
unarmed and crawling on the ground with mortal wounds), but this is what 
they're taught and trained and told to do.  If you take even well-intentioned, 
young soldiers and stick them in the middle of a dangerous war zone for years 
and train them to think and act this way, this will inevitably be the result.  
The video is an indicment of the U.S. government and the war policies it 
pursues.
All of this is usually kept from us.  Unlike those in the Muslim world, who are 
shown these realities quite frequently by their free press, we don't usually 
see what is done by us.  We stay blissfully insulated from it, so that in those 
rare instances when we're graphically exposed to it, we can tell ourselves that 
it's all very unusual and rare.  That's how we collectively dismissed the 
Abu Ghraib photos, and it's why the Obama administration took such 
extraordinary steps to suppress all the rest of the torture photos:  because 
further disclosure would have revealed that behavior to be standard and common, 
not at all unusual or extraordinary.
Precisely the same dynamic applies to the Pentagon's admission yesterday that 
its original claims about the brutal February killing of five civilians in 
Eastern Afghanistan were totally false.   What happened there -- the slaughter 
of unthreatening civilians, official lies told about the incident, the 
dissemination of those lies by an uncritical U.S. media -- is what happens 
constantly (the same deceitful cover-up behavior took place with the Iraq 
video).  The lies about the Afghan killings were exposed in this instance not 
because they're rare, but because one very intrepid, relentless reporter 
happened to be able to travel to the remote province and speak to witnesses and 
investigate the event, forcing the Pentagon to acknowledge the truth.
The value of the Wikileaks/Iraq video and the Afghanistan revelation is not 
that they exposed unusually horrific events.  The value is in realizing that 
these event are anything but unusual. 
* * * * * *
Here's the Democracy Now segment I did this morning with Assange.  The bulk of 
the discussion, appropriately, is devoted to hearing from him about the 
videotape, and it's very worth watching; my participation begins at roughly 
35:30:

 
Adobe Flash Player is required
to watch video inline on this page,
and JavaScript must be enabled.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25150.htm


      

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke