Israel's Plan For A Military
Strike On Iran
By Jonathan Cook
13 October, 2006
Countercurrents.org

The Middle East, and possibly the world, stands on the brink of a terrible 
conflagration as Israel and the United States prepare to deal with Iran's 
alleged ambition to acquire nuclear weapons. Israel, it becomes clearer by the 
day, wants to use its air force to deliver a knock-out blow against Tehran. It 
is not known whether it will use conventional weapons or a nuclear warhead in 
such a strike.
At this potentially cataclysmic moment in global politics, it is good to see 
that one of the world's leading broadcasters, the BBC, decided this week that 
it should air a documentary entitled "Will Israel bomb Iran?". It is the 
question on everyone's lips and doubtless, with the imprimatur of the BBC, the 
programme will sell around the world.
The good news ends there, however. Because the programme addresses none of the 
important issues raised by Israel's increasingly belligerent posture towards 
Tehran.
It does not explain that, without a United Nations resolution, a military 
strike on Iran to destroy its nuclear research programme would be a gross 
violation of international law.
It does not clarify that Israel's own large nuclear arsenal was secretly 
developed and is entirely unmonitored by the International Atomic Energy 
Agency, or that it is perceived as a threat by its neighbours and may be 
fuelling a Middle East arms race.
Nor does the programme detail the consequences of an Israeli strike on 
instability and violence across the Middle East, including in Iraq, where 
British and American troops are stationed as an occupying force.
And there is no consideration of how in the longer term unilateral action by 
Israel, with implicit sanction by the international community, is certain to 
provoke a steep rise in global jihad against the West.
Instead the programme dedicates 40 minutes to footage of Top Gun heroics by the 
Israeli air force, and the recollections of pilots who carried out a similar, 
"daring" attack on Iraq's nuclear reactor in the early 1980s; menacing long 
shots of Iran's nuclear research facilities; and interviews with three former 
Israeli prime ministers, a former Israeli military chief of staff, various 
officials in Israeli military intelligence and a professor who designs Israel's 
military arsenal.
All of them speak with one voice: Israel, they claim, is about to be "wiped 
out" by Iranian nuclear weapons and must defend itself "whatever the 
consequences".
They are given plenty of airtime to repeat unchallenged well-worn propaganda 
Israel has been peddling through its own media, and which has been credulously 
amplified by the international media: that Iran is led by a fanatical 
anti-Semite who, like Adolf Hitler, believes he can commit genocide against the 
Jewish people, this time through a nuclear holocaust.
Other Israeli misinformation, none of it believed by serious analysts, is also 
uncritically spread by the film-makers: that Hizbullah in Lebanon is a puppet 
of Iran, waiting to aid its master in Israel's destruction; that Iran is only 
months away from creating nuclear weapons, a "point of no return", as the 
programme warns; and that a "fragile" Israel is under constant threat of 
annihilation from all its Arab neighbours.
But the programme's unequivocal main theme -- echoing precisely Israel's own 
agenda -- is that Iran's president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is hellbent on 
destroying Israel. The film-makers treat seriously, bordering on reverentially, 
preposterous comments from Israel's leaders about this threat.
Shimon Peres, the Israeli government's veteran roving ambassador, claims, for 
example, that Iran has made "a call for genocide" against Israel, compares an 
Iranian nuclear bomb to a "flying concentration camp", and warns that "no one 
would like to see a comeback to the times of the Nazis".
Cabinet minister Avi Dichter, a former head of the Shin Bet domestic security 
service, believes Israel faces "an existential threat" from Iran. And Zvi 
Stauber, a former senior figure in military intelligence, compares Israel's 
situation to a man whose neighbour "has a gun and he declares every day he is 
going to kill you".
But pride of place goes to Binyamin Netanyahu, a former prime minister and the 
current leader of the opposition. He claims repeatedly that the only possible 
reason Iran and its president could want a nuclear arsenal is for Israel's 
"extermination". "If he can get away with it, he'll do it." "Ayatollahs with 
atombic bombs are a powerful threat to all of us." A nuclear Iran "is a threat 
unlike anything we have seen before. It's beyond politics" -- apparently worse 
than the nuclear states of North Korea and Pakistan, the latter a military 
dictatorship and friend of the US barely containing within its borders some of 
the most fanatical jihadist movements in the world.
Apart from a brief appearance by an Iranian diplomat, no countervailing 
opinions are entertained in the BBC programme; only Israel's military and 
political leadership is allowed to speak.
The documentary gives added credence to the views of Israel's security 
establishment by making great play of a speech by Ahmadinejad -- one with which 
the Israeli authorities and their allies in Washington have made endless 
mischief -- in which the Iranian president repeats a statement by Iran's late 
spiritual leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, that went unnoticed when first uttered.
In the BBC programme, Ahmadenijad is quoted as saying: "The regime occupying 
Jerusalem should be eliminated from the page of history". This is at least an 
improvement on the original translation, much repeated in the programme by 
Netanyahu and others, that "Israel must be wiped off the map".
But for some strange reason, the programme makers infer from their more 
accurate translation the same diabolical intent on Ahmadinejad's part as 
suggested by Netanyahu's fabricated version. Iran's nuclear weapons, we are 
told by the programme as if they are already in existence, have "presented 
Israel's leaders with a new order of threat". In making his speech, the BBC 
film argues, Ahmadinejad "issued a death sentence against Israel".
But, as has now been pointed out on numerous occasions (though clearly not 
often enough for the BBC to have noticed), Khomeini and Ahmadinejad were 
referring to the need for regime change, the ending of the regime occupying the 
Palestinians in violation of international law. They were not talking, as 
Netanyahu and co claim, about the destruction of the state of Israel or the 
Jewish people. The implication of the speech is that the current Israeli regime 
will end because occupying powers are illegitimate and unsustainable, not 
because Iran plans to fire nuclear missiles at the Jewish state or commit 
genocide.
Overlooked by the programme makers is the fact that "fragile" Israel is 
currently the only country in the Middle East armed with nuclear warheads, 
several hundred of them, as well as one of the most powerful armies in the 
world, which presumably make most of its neighbours feel "fragile" too, with 
far more reason.
And, as we are being persuaded how "fragile" Israel really is, another former 
prime minister, Ehud Barak, is interviewed. "Ultimately we are standing alone," 
he says, in apparent justification for an illegal, unilateral strike. Iran's 
nuclear reasearch facilities, Barak warns, are hidden deep underground, so deep 
that "no conventional weapon can penetrate", leaving us to infer that in such 
circumstances Israel will have no choice but use a tactical nuclear strike in 
its "self-defence". And, getting into his stride, Barak adds that some 
facilities are in crowded urban areas "where any attack could end up in 
civilian collateral damage".
But despite the terrifying scenario laid out by Israel's leaders, the BBC 
website cheerleads for Israel in the same manner as the programme-makers, 
suggesting that Israel has the right to engineer a clash of civilisations: 
"With America unlikely to take military action, the pressure is growing on 
Israel's leaders to launch a raid."
As should be clear by now, the Israeli government's fingerprints are all over 
this BBC "documentary". And that is hardly surprising because the man behind 
this "independent" production is Israel's leading film-maker: Noam Shalev.
Shalev, a graduate of a New York film school, has been making a spate of 
documentaries through his production company Highlight Films, based in 
Herzliya, near Tel Aviv, that have been lapped up by the BBC and other foreign 
broadcasters. With the BBC's stamp of approval, it is easy for Shalev to sell 
his films around the world.
Shalev, who claims that he doesn't "espouse a political view", started his 
career by making documentaries on less controversial subjects. He has produced 
films on Ethiopian immigrants arriving in Israel, and on the Zaka organisation, 
Jewish religious fundamentalists who arrive at the scene of suicide attacks 
quite literally to pick up the pieces, of human remains.
In the past his films managed to bypass the reticence of broadcasters like the 
BBC to broach the combustible subject of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict 
outside their news programmes by touching on the topic obliquely. Importantly, 
however, Shalev's films always humanise his Israeli subjects, showing them as 
complex, emotional and caring beings, while largely ignoring the millions of 
Palestinians the Israeli government and army are oppressing.
According to a profile of Shalev published in the Israeli media in 2004, his 
success derives from the fact that he has developed a "soft-sell approach", 
showing Israel in a good light without "the straightforward 'hasbara' 
[propaganda] efforts which explain Israel's case that Israel's Foreign Ministry 
is required to disseminate to European and American news outlets."
In the words of an Israeli public relations executive, Shalev has a skill in 
telling Israel's story in ways that international broadcasters appreciate: 
"[Shalev] also shows the Israeli side, he is not one of those traitors who sell 
their ideology for money. He has the skill to market it in such a way that 
overseas they want to see it, and this is very important."
But recently Shalev has grown more confident to try the hard sell for Israel, 
apparently sure that the BBC and other foreign broadcasters will still buy his 
films. And that is because Shalev offers them something that other film-makers 
cannot: intimate access to Israel's security forces, an area off-limits to his 
rivals.
Before the disengagement from Gaza last year, for example, Shalev made a 
sympathetic documentary, shown by the BBC, about a day in the life of one 
Israeli soldier serving there. The film largely concealed the context that 
might have alerted viewers to the fact that the soldier was enforcing a 
four-decade illegal occupation of Gaza, or that the Strip is an open-air prison 
in which thousands of Palestinian have been killed by the Israeli army and in 
which a majority of Gazans live in abject poverty.
Interviewed about the documentary, Shalev observed: "The army really is very, 
very careful. There is no indiscriminate firing. I saw, and this was not a show 
put on just for us, that before any shot is fired there is confirmation that 
there is nobody behind or in front of the objective. The army is very sensitive 
to non-deliberate fire."
In other words, Shalev's film for the BBC shed no light on why Israel's 
"deliberate" fire has killed hundreds of Palestinian children during the second 
intifada or why a large number of civilians have died from Israeli gunfire and 
missile strikes inside the Gaza Strip.
Earlier this year Shalev made another film for the BBC, "The Hunt for Black 
October", to coincide with the release of Stephen Spielberg's movie Munich. 
"The BBC gains exclusive access to the undercover Mossad agents assigned to 
track down the Palestinian group responsible for the murder of Israeli athletes 
at the 1972 Munich Olympics," the BBC was able to glow in its promotional 
material.
Shalev's latest film, "Will Israel bomb Iran?", follows this well-trodden path. 
Arabs and Muslims are again deprived of a voice, as are non-Israeli experts.
So why did the BBC buy this blatant piece of propaganda?
Here are a few clues. Shalev's film includes:
* footage taken from inside Hizbullah bunkers under the supervision of the 
Israeli army as it occupied south Lebanon.
* a "rare view" of the inside of the Israeli army's satellite control room, 
which spies on Israel's Arab neighbours and Iran and which, according to 
programme, is "incredibly guarded about its security arrangements".
* an exclusive appearance by Israel's former military chief of staff, Moshe 
Yaalon, who we are told is "rarely interviewed".
* a glimpse inside a Rafael weapons factory, which the programme tells us is 
"rarely filmed".
In other words, the BBC, and the other broadcasters who will air this 
"documentary" in the coming weeks and months, has been dazzled by Shalev's 
ability to show us the secret world of the Israeli army. So dazzled, it seems, 
that it has forgotten to check -- or worse, simply doesn't care -- what message 
Shalev is inserting between his exclusive footage.
It might have occurred to someone at the BBC to wonder why Shalev gets these 
chances to show things no one else is allowed to. Could it be that the 
"hasbara" division of the Israeli Foreign Ministry has got far more 
sophisticated than it once was?
Is the Israeli government using Shalev, wittingly or not, and is he in turn 
using the BBC, to spread Israeli propaganda? Propaganda that may soon propel us 
towards the "clash of civilisations" so longed for by Israel's leadership.
Jonathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. His website 
is www.jkcook.net




***************************************************************************
Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg 
Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia
***************************************************************************
__________________________________________________________________________
Mohon Perhatian:

1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik)
2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari.
3. Reading only, http://dear.to/ppi 
4. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
5. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Kirim email ke