BALANCE AT THE U.N. Repair schemes can't please all nations
By RICHARD HALLORAN Special to The Japan Times HONOLULU -- The proposal that Japan, India, Germany and Brazil become permanent members of the U.N. Security Council is almost certain to fail, but it may trigger sweeping reforms in a 1945 institution incapable of coping with the issues of 2005. Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer and Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva presented their joint bid in New York on Sept. 22, asserting "they are legitimate candidates for permanent membership in an expanded Security Council." The Security Council today has five permanent members with the veto -- the United States, China, Russia, Britain and France (the victors of World War II). Ten other members are chosen to rotate through the council on two-year terms. Opposition to the new proposal was immediate. China, South Korea and North Korea objected to Japan's bid. Pakistan, with support from China, opposed India. Italy opposed Germany, while Spanish-speaking Mexico, Argentina and Chile opposed Portuguese-speaking Brazil. Moreover, Egypt, Nigeria and South Africa each said it should be a permanent member. Other Africans argued for more representation, as did Arabs, Asians and Latin Americans. Secretary General Kofi Annan, has ordered a study due by the end of the year on possible changes. Observers of the United Nations said reform is the talk of the headquarters in New York because the U.N.'s ineptitude has become increasingly clear. In its latest dithering, the U.N. has dawdled over the Sudan in Africa where 6,000 to 10,000 people a month are dying from starvation or being killed in civil strife. As David Brooks of The New York Times has written: "The United States said the killing in Darfur was indeed genocide, the Europeans weren't so sure, and the Arab League said definitely not. Hairs were split and legalisms were parsed, and the debate over how many corpses you can fit on the head of a pin proceeded in stentorian tones while the mass extermination of human beings continued at a pace that may or may not rise to the level of genocide." On long-standing conflicts in Asia, the U.N. has done little to foster reunification of South Korea and North Korea, to ease the dispute between China and Taiwan over that island's fate, to combat terror and piracy in Southeast Asia, to mediate between India and Pakistan over Kashmir, to end 20 years of ethnic strife in Sri Lanka. Victor David Hanson, an historian at Stanford University, wrote recently: "Our global watchdog, the United Nations, had been largely silent. It abdicates its responsibility of ostracizing those states that harbor mass murderers, much less organize a multilateral posse to bring them to justice." Schemes for fixing the U.N. Security Council and General Assembly have been flying around for months. The key is to find an acceptable balance among the major powers, the middle powers and the smaller nations. In the Security Council, the world's powers supposedly exercise leadership, but Britain and France have long since slipped off that top shelf. If they could be persuaded not to veto reforms, perhaps a three-tiered Security Council could be assembled. Criteria for the top and middle tiers would be population, political stability, economic strength and military power. The top tier would comprise the U.S., the European Union (including Britain, France, Germany, and Italy), China, India, Japan and Russia. The veto would be diluted by requiring two to block an action. In the middle would be permanent members without a veto -- such as Brazil, Nigeria, Pakistan, South Korea, Indonesia, Egypt and Mexico. In the third tier would be members rotating by geographic region -- Eastern Europe, Latin America, Africa, Asia, the Arab world, and Pacific island nations. In the General Assembly, which has nearly quadrupled from 51 members in 1945 to 191 members today, the U.S. vote counts no more than that of Palau, population 20,000. Consequently, the assembly is largely ignored. To make the General Assembly effective, weighted voting would be tried. A nation, for instance, would get one vote for every 100 million people and another for every 2 percent of the world's gross national product. That would give the U.S. 17 votes (three plus 14) and China 14 votes (13 plus two). Resolutions would be binding -- they are not now -- if they gained two-thirds of the votes. All of this is admittedly speculative. As a devoted advocate of the U.N. says, "That the U.N. does not fairly represent today's world is true, but that doesn't make re-organizing it any easier." Richard Halloran, formerly a correspondent for Business Week, The Washington Post and The New York Times, is a freelance journalist. The Japan Times: Oct. 3, 2004 (C) All rights reserved [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/BRUplB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> *************************************************************************** Berdikusi dg Santun & Elegan, dg Semangat Persahabatan. Menuju Indonesia yg Lebih Baik, in Commonality & Shared Destiny. www.ppiindia.shyper.com *************************************************************************** __________________________________________________________________________ Mohon Perhatian: 1. Harap tdk. memposting/reply yg menyinggung SARA (kecuali sbg otokritik) 2. Pesan yg akan direply harap dihapus, kecuali yg akan dikomentari. 3. Lihat arsip sebelumnya, www.ppi-india.da.ru; 4. Posting: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5. Satu email perhari: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 6. No-email/web only: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7. kembali menerima email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ppiindia/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
