On 10 Jan 2011, at 19:58, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:33:17 GMT, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> Another reason why this won't work is that you only have one slot -- the same
>> value is shared between every subclass of vcs-type-mixin. Adding a separate
>> slot to each subclass is a
That sounds like a good way for it to work.
I'm not sure how safe it would be to depend on each
of the extant implementation of Common Lisp to
do this. It would probably be best if they all
conformed; the only drawback would be the
tiny possibility that some code somewhere is
depending on the ex
On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:33:17 GMT, Martin Simmons wrote:
> Another reason why this won't work is that you only have one slot -- the same
> value is shared between every subclass of vcs-type-mixin. Adding a separate
> slot to each subclass is a pain.
Oh, right, my fault here. I remember elaborate
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2011 18:07:48 +0300, Samium Gromoff said:
>
> On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 15:48:33 +0100, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> >
> > On 8 Jan 2011, at 14:15, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 23:42:23 +0100, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> > >> There is no real advantage in having sh
