> "Symbols that print the same USUALLY are EQ to each other because of the use
> of the INTERN function."
Unusual cases, eh?Are there example’s that don’t involve uninterned
symbol’s?
> (eq '#:zzz '#:zzz)
nil
> (flet ((f (&aux (*gensym-counter* 123)) (print (gensym (eq (f) (f)))
#:g123
On Nov 18, 2013, at 3:58 AM, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> asdf ... not a debugging or utilities library.
Good news, uiop is a utility library
While I think this is cute and it makes me chortle, I find it to be too cute.
I think it "models a bad behavior." I don't want to have to fight back against
On Oct 3, 2013, at 4:44 PM, Ian Dalton wrote:
> How do I unsubscribe from this list? I can't find a home page for it.
I believe you send an email to: pro+unsubscr...@common-lisp.net
On Sep 22, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Faré wrote:
>> (defmacro assocf (item alist &optional default &rest keys &key test test-not
>> key)
>> …
> … side-effects ...
Lispwork's has cdr-assoc, which works on places:
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/lw50/LWRM/html/lwref-618.htm
See also https://co
Is there an excel-hater's mailing list we could move this discussion
to. :)
ps - Is it possible to open the slime inspector on a stack frame or
frames?
___
pro mailing list
pro@common-lisp.net
http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf
On Mar 29, 2011, at 6:08 PM, Bob Kerns wrote:
While I can see advantages to having a form record where it came
from, as you guys are describing, there's also a huge disadvantage
-- the need to actually expand (and possibly evaluate) that macro,
before being able to use meta-dot.
I use tag
On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Mark H. David wrote:
> Can you explain a bit what you mean by this?
My example. Say I have a macro for defining widgets and I use it I
define cool-widget on line N of file foo.lisp like so:
(define-widget cool-widget ...)
In the wonderful world which is my i
On Mar 25, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Kazimir Majorinc wrote:
> "DEFVAR and DEFPARAMETER do the combined service of
>
> - in some implementations, recording the "definitional home" of the
> variable ...
That reminds me; I desire an implementation independent library that
abstracts out the recording of
On Jan 14, 2011, at 11:42 AM, Daniel Weinreb wrote:
> If you have a function that is a predicate, in the sense that
> the function's contract says that its value should be interpreted
> as being either false or true, do you think it's better to code
> it so that it always returns "t" for the true c
On Dec 2, 2010, at 6:00 PM, Daniel Weinreb wrote:
> In case these terms are too old for anyone to know
> them, we used to use the phrase "for effect" to
> mean a function that was called for the sake
> of its side-effects, ...
> In some code I have seen, the author of the code
> has written (valu
On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:38 PM, David Owen wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Ben Hyde wrote:
>> Anyhow. Recall that with-slots expands to slot-value. That leads
>> me to wonder. Given that with-slots and slot-value are couple, why
>> haven't I observed analogous couple (w
On Dec 1, 2010, at 9:51 AM, Daniel Weinreb wrote:
> The methods called by the callers (1) expect to find the object in a
> consistent state, and (2) must leave the object in a consistent state
> when they terminate, whether they terminate normally (return) or
> abruptly (signal, return, throw, etc.
12 matches
Mail list logo
