On 20 January 2011 13:16, Sam Steingold wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Drew Crampsie wrote:
>> The root of the perceived problem is a lack of resources, not a lack
>> of effort or desire on the part of the "lisp community".
>
> I think Franz, Lispwork
On 20 January 2011 12:03, Daniel Weinreb wrote:
> Alexander,
>
> Here's my own interpretation of what Drew said, which I admit
> may or may not be what he had in mind. (I do agree that he
> said it in a rude way.)
In my own defense, i immediately followed up with this :
"Didn't quite mean to be
o worry about. Well
> done.
I'm not going to get in this argument on this mailing list, i don't
think it's the place. If you'd like to have this discussion, please
feel free to email me privately.
Cheers,
drewc
> Alex
>
>
>
> On Jan 20, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Dre
I use files and quicklisp when developing, but deliver and provision
binary images.
Most of my apps are web based, and i run the lisp image behind runit,
a service manager that handles logging as well as startup and
shutdown, and restarting the image if it crashes. It also makes
rolling back a rel
