On 13 mei 2012, at 19:47, Pascal Costanza wrote:
> I already find that placing a pair of #| |# around the s-expression in
> question takes far too much time than necessary.
Even if you'd bind that action to a quick key?
___
pro mailing list
pro@commo
Hi Mark and the others,
On 20 dec. 2011, at 18:25, "Mark H. David" wrote:
> Didier, your library looks by far the most complete, but therefore it's a bit
> daunting.
I have used CLON here:
-
http://github.com/aerique/google-ai-challenge-2011-1-ants/blob/master/src-play-game/play-game.lisp
-
On 28 jun. 2011, at 13:34, Marco Antoniotti
wrote:
>
> I agree that this should be worked on cooperatively. I do not know if this
> should be a "big" proposal.
Perhaps a first step would be gathering up all the work-around / wrapper code
that people have produced to deal with these issues?
On 14 jun. 2011, at 19:48, Zach Beane wrote:
>
> I recently ran into some accidentally unportable code that specialized a
> method argument on DOUBLE-FLOAT. It worked in SBCL but failed in CLISP
> because CLISP provides no DOUBLE-FLOAT class.
Yes, I had the same thing once with specializing on
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 07:48:50AM -0500, Daniel Weinreb wrote:
>
> Our utility library calls it "strcat". I think string-concat is
> probaby better.
>
> Dave Moon established the general ethic on the Lisp machine of using
> longer, clearer names in general.
I generally prefer more descriptive (
