On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Antoni Grzymała wrote:
> Tako rzecze Nathan Froyd (2014-04-25, 16:42):
>> Ironclad has many deficiencies that make it unsuitable for serious
>> cryptographic software.
>
> I'm curious what they would be – would you be able to outline th
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:20 PM, William Lederer
wrote:
> Thus, I feel Lisp is better but not a total panacea. For example, has the
> Ironclad library been examined by a cryptographer? Does it, for example, do
> constant-time comparisons to avoid timing leaks?
The answer to these (and many other
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 5:57 AM, Tamas Papp wrote:
> I understand this. My main question is: why not do this with compiler
> macros? Is there any reason for this, other than historical?
3.2.2.1.3 might offer some insight: "However, no language processor
(compiler, evaluator, or other code walker
