I haven't used Common Lisp professionally since 2014. These days I pay my
bills using Clojure/ClojureScript for web stuff and Julia for machine
learning and scientific computing. I still miss Common Lisp sometimes, and
I enjoy lurking and seeing the occasional discussion in this mailing list.
Tord
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Svante Carl v. Erichsen
wrote:
>
> I should call it string-conc, conc-string, or conc->string.
I actually agree. What I meant is that if you really want to use a
mathematical operator for this, multiplication is the natural choice.
Your suggestions above -- at le
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:22 PM, karol skocik wrote:
> Some time ago, I tried to communicate on IRC channel about a very,
> very simple addition:
> string+, which is obviously a nice, small name for (apply
> #'concatenate 'string strings).
Pet peeve: string+ is a *small* name, but it is not a *n
