On Jun 26, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Bill Arnold wrote:
I know you're not stupid
rof,lmao!
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
LOL
If you include Visual FoxPro with Foxpro it's the most popular
language in China. Too bad they don't buy any.
New Lower Prices *
Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription
Not compared to Bright Boy
--- Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 26, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Bill Arnold wrote:
I know you're not stupid
rof,lmao!
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
[excessive quoting removed by server]
On Jun 26, 2006, at 10:29 AM, paul brown wrote:
I don't see why there is no appeal process either - if the ref has
made an error
then it should be recinded but with Captain Luddite in charge of
FIFA, there's
little chance of either of these things happening.
The fundamental part of Law 5
On Jun 26, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Frank Burcaw wrote:
I've been posting new threads to profox@leafe.com - is that the
correct address?
Yes, but why do you ask? Having any problems?
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
___
Mike yearwood wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 06:51:05 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Strong parameter checking
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
secureserver.net
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
From: Mike yearwood [EMAIL
Michael Madigan wrote:
Seriously, no kidding, helping people who hate us makes no sense at
all. There are plenty of deserving Americans who need the help just
as much. With all the illiteracy, drugs, violence, illigitimacy,
etc. in the inner city schools, seems to me we should be spending
I know that the country has the attention span of a fruit fly, but
for those who aren't easily distracted by non-issues such as Gay
Marriage and Illegal Mexicans, you might want to read this:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/06/23/lobbyist.probe.ap/index.html?
( -or-
Let me ask you this,
Is your head that pointy under the hat?
http://tk.files.storage.msn.com/x1pFeqfYuS6GVCnG7XPnySnergYls05MxGv749b-Fxam4jdjRiH_X4lQDnI9zEUVujor7xvSaP6yOvYtvqTzzoVibFlOlNSEsQb8GY0LXG5_9I5iwWfZsILFFA8Sco7pUKD
--- Stephen the Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan
Yeah, we're being invaded and it's a non-issue
--- Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know that the country has the attention span of a fruit fly, but
for those who aren't easily distracted by non-issues such as Gay
Marriage and Illegal Mexicans, you might want to read this:
http://leafe.com/archives/showMsg/193342
Where has Jerry been?
--- Stephen the Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
Not compared to Bright Boy
I don't know, Bright Boy is still at least 75 watts. Who the heck is Bright
Boy anyway? Are you more the candlestick variety
Google on Javascript local file system and see if you still think it's
safe. The Flash sandbox is generally considered safe; Javascript is not.
Hank Fay
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Andy Davies
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 9:25 AM
To:
Is there a way to set the width of a FireFox html form's input tag when
the tag's type attribute = file?
input name=FileToUpload type=file /
In FireFox 1.5 for Windows, setting the width: via a style
definition or an inline style=width:300px attribute fails to change
the width for these type of
Is there a way to set the width of a FireFox html form's input tag when the
tag's type attribute = file?
After some more research (google is my friend!) I learned that FireFox
does honor the size=### attribute of input tags with a type=file
attribute. BUT: This is clearly a hack.
NOTE: There
Hi Hank,
Google on Javascript local file system and see if you still think it's
safe.
Did that. I checked the links on the first two pages (20 results):
Not talking about security problems: 18
Problem in Adobe Acrobat 5: 1
A VBScript virus from 1998: 1
In other words: Unless you use old
Hi Ted,
Similarly, implementations of Javascript and AJAX have leaked files to the
OS, allowed some nasty cross-site scripting issues
I can't let that go by uncommented... s
JavaScript is not the reason for cross-site scripting problems. In fact, as
we see an increase in JavaScript based
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo