Hi Everybody,
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20110627/ARCHIVES/106271023/-1/todayspaper?Title=School-avoids-words-like-him-and-her-
"STOCKHOLM - At the "Egalia" preschool, the staff members avoid using
words like "him" or "her" and address the 33 child
Hi Everybody,
Green, now - green I tell you . . .
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20110627/ARCHIVES/106271041/-1/todayspaper?p=1&tc=pg
Of course, Gorehole still has his SUV. Hypocrite.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen
On 6/26/2011 9:57 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> Sytze:
>
> Warning: Legacy knowledge follows, as my last significant VFP app dev
> was in 2004.
And we're very grateful that you've hung around to help since then!
Kudos and special thanks to so many like you who still help despite VFP
not being your reg
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Rafael Copquin
wrote:
> Is it possible to pass a VFP 9 object as a parameter to a SQL Server
> stored procedure?
>
> The idea is something like this:
>
> select mycursor
> scatter name oMyCursor
>
> cCmd = [exec sp_mysp oMyCursor]
>
---
Not sure how this h
Thank you both, Tracy and Ted.
I'll read about passign XML
Rafael
El 27/06/2011 11:16, Tracy Pearson escribió:
> Rafael Copquin wrote on 2011-06-27:
>> Is it possible to pass a VFP 9 object as a parameter to a SQL Server
>> stored procedure?
>>
>> The idea is something like this:
>>
>> s
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Rafael Copquin
wrote:
> Is it possible to pass a VFP 9 object as a parameter to a SQL Server
> stored procedure?
This is FoxPro. Everything is possible.
Is it wise? No.
You could, in theory, construct a DCOM (Distributed COM) object and
matching server on the S
Rafael Copquin wrote on 2011-06-27:
> Is it possible to pass a VFP 9 object as a parameter to a SQL Server
> stored procedure?
>
> The idea is something like this:
>
> select mycursor
> scatter name oMyCursor
>
> cCmd = [exec sp_mysp oMyCursor]
>
> SQLExec(nHandle,cCmd)
>
> and g
IMO, you succeeded proving your point.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Grigore Dolghin wrote:
>> Sorry, I pressed send to early. It also executes the select with Exec.
>> So much about query optimizer, data exection plan, built-in
>> sta
Is it possible to pass a VFP 9 object as a parameter to a SQL Server
stored procedure?
The idea is something like this:
select mycursor
scatter name oMyCursor
cCmd = [exec sp_mysp oMyCursor]
SQLExec(nHandle,cCmd)
and get the SQL Server SP process all fields from the VFP cursor passed
inside
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Grigore Dolghin wrote:
> Sorry, I pressed send to early. It also executes the select with Exec.
> So much about query optimizer, data exection plan, built-in
> statistics. Frankly, if I'd be his boss I'd fire him ON THE SPOT.
--
Plans are overrated
Like Jerry mentioned, you can set up your tables with relations, assuming the
data supports that, and create a grid, etc. But you can keep it relatively low
tech and just use table.field notation in your BROWSE command (i.e. BROWSE
FIELDS table1.column1, table3.column2, table2.column10, etc.). M
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Grigore Dolghin wrote:
> I watched the video. While I agree that works, it still sucks. "DROP"
> can be LEGIT data. I just don't understand why people avoid a built-in
> fail-proof method readily available and use instead all sorts of
> improvisations. WTF. What if
GETOBJECT with the syntax you're using is supposed to retrieve a reference to
an existing object. For example, you want to perform some kind of DOC
manipulation and want to use a running instance of Word. If it can't find one,
it returns an OLE error. Depending on what I'm trying to accomplish,
On Jun 27, 2011, at 7:55 AM, Grigore Dolghin wrote:
> I watched the video. While I agree that works, it still sucks. "DROP"
> can be LEGIT data. I just don't understand why people avoid a built-in
> fail-proof method readily available and use instead all sorts of
> improvisations. WTF. What if @Fi
Sorry, I pressed send to early. It also executes the select with Exec.
So much about query optimizer, data exection plan, built-in
statistics. Frankly, if I'd be his boss I'd fire him ON THE SPOT.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Grigore Dolghin wrote:
> I watched the video. While I agree that wo
I watched the video. While I agree that works, it still sucks. "DROP"
can be LEGIT data. I just don't understand why people avoid a built-in
fail-proof method readily available and use instead all sorts of
improvisations. WTF. What if @Filters is longer than 200 chars?
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:49
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
>
>> > 2. Many search engines strip out punctuation of all kinds, and sometimes
>> > even spaces, in user input, before submitting the search term to a query.
>> > This is what Google does, in essence (though I'm sure they're much more
>> > sophis
We have some corporate machine inventory software (can't remember the
name) that would do this with my FPW, until I killed the relevant
process.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription M
18 matches
Mail list logo
