Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
I just set all three registry settings back to their defaults:DirectoryCacheLifetime=10FileInfoCacheLifetime=10FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=5 There was no increase in speed. Anyone have any other advice? Thanks,Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Philip Borkholder" To: profoxt...

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
Followup question Alan,When you stopped setting these to zero because Win 10 was "fixed" How did you leave the File Server LanManServer settings for :SMB1SMB2SMB3 Some recommendations out there state we need to shut off SMB2 & 3 and turn on SMB1 on newer File Servers This File Server has not shu

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
Thanks Alan,I thought we had to always have them set for Windows 10.I'll try that.-Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Alan Bourke" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:44:36 +0100 On Thu, 2 Jul 20

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Alan Bourke
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 4:11 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: > I set the LanManWorkstation > settings for to avoid CDX > corruption:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] > FileInfoCacheLifetime = > 0FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=0DirectoryCacheLifetime=0

RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
Thank you Tracy,I'll review that with my customer. Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Tracy Pearson" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:47:42 -0400 What I have seen is a couple of network bottlene

RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Tracy Pearson
What I have seen is a couple of network bottleneck issues. 1) The VFP exe should be on the local machine and accessing the data on the network. This removes a security layer and a network layer that happens when a section of the binary needs to be read. My VFP exe is over 20 MB. 2) The network ca

DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
We a client using an ERP systems in VFP9 DBFs for their data. One of their users just got a new Dell XPS Notebook it has super slow results.It has an i7-9750H gen Intel processor with Win 10 64bit connecting to Windows Sever Essentials 2012 R2 server It is using a 1GB Card and shows it is connec

Re: ProFox archives error

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
Thanks Ed! Philip B Sponsored by https://www.newser.com/?utm_source=part&utm_medium=uol&utm_campaign=rss_taglines_more The World's Richest Person Is Now Richer Than Ever http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3241/5efdf59d71997759d442bs

Re: ProFox archives error

2020-07-02 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jul 2, 2020, at 7:25 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: > >> On Jul 1, 2020, at 17:48, Ed Leafe wrote: >>> Looks like an update to the Elasticsearch backend. Let me investigate. >> Turned out to be a bit of corruption in the index. Should be working fine >> now! >> >> And thanks for let

Re: ProFox archives error

2020-07-02 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
On 7/2/2020 7:44 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: On Jul 1, 2020, at 17:48, Ed Leafe wrote: Looks like an update to the Elasticsearch backend. Let me investigate. Turned out to be a bit of corruption in the index. Should be working fine now! And thanks for letting me know! -- Ed Leafe What's the datab

Re: ProFox archives error

2020-07-02 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jul 1, 2020, at 17:48, Ed Leafe wrote: > > Looks like an update to the Elasticsearch backend. Let me investigate. Turned out to be a bit of corruption in the index. Should be working fine now! And thanks for letting me know! -- Ed Leafe ___