I tried:
change fields fieldname1+'  '+fieldname2+" ", fieldname3

"I got a unrecog phrase/keyword in cmd" error

by the way, I am running 2.6 if that is material

John


On 03/25/2015 04:44 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
I'd forgotten about CHANGE! I believe EDIT is a synonym.

Clever work-around!


On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Michael Glassman
<mhglass...@pioneerdrama.com> wrote:
John,

I work with FoxPro for DOS v2.5, and a two-line BROWSE window isn’t possible.  
You can, however, approximate this with a CHANGE window, in which all fields 
have their own line.  If you want just two lines, though, then concatenate the 
fields for the first line like this:

     CHANGE FIELDS Ticket = Ticket_No + " | " + Account_No + " | " + Name + " | 
" + City, Comments

Mike


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: mailto:v...@optonline.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2015 4:39 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: FoxPro/DOS 2 Lines per record in a browse?

IDK - FPD - 2 lines in a Browse? It's old & probably not possible!

-K-

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 25, 2015, at 6:31 PM, "John R. Sowden" <jsow...@americansentry.net> 
wrote:

I am trying to generate a browse window with thinks kine ticket #, Account 
Number, Name, City on line one, and about a 70 char
field of text on line 2 in a browse window.  The help screen does not reference 
this, in fact the word 'line' does not exist in the help for browse.

help?

John


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/5513526d.4080...@americansentry.net
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to