Mike,
> Bounce the email back to me so I can
> say Doh, slap my forehead and fix it without being seen as
> inconsiderate by anyone.
You are correct. That is the most reasonable choice in this case.
Kristyne
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Su
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 11:17:08 -0700
> From: "Kristyne McDaniel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Replying To ProfoxTech Digest ;)
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset
Paul,
> What is so hard with:
>
> click reply
> change subject if needed
> trim excess
> type response
> click send
>
> And if gmail is a limiting factor, why limit yourself?
I was thinking the same thing about gmail myself...
Kristyne
___
Post Me
Mike,
> My habit is click reply type something click send. I save my cranial
> exersions for work. Any good suggestions to simplifying replying to
> Profox with gmail will be appreciated.
If you just send a bunch of flotsam without trimming, you're telling your
recipient that you don't value *the
On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:13 AM, Mike yearwood wrote:
> I'd rather you just bounce them back to the sender.
I like that idea, too.
Ken
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free ver
Mike yearwood wrote:
> Frankly it's a PITA (using gmail) to remember to switch to plain text,
Email is much nicer IMO when you always stick to plain text. Email was
never intended to send all the crap we send with it today. In
Thunderbird, I read messages in the format they were sent in (I see H
Hi Ed
I'd rather you just bounce them back to the sender. That way at least
the poster gets feedback that they made a mistake. To err is human. To
build software that doesn't appreciate that fact is unfortunately all
too common.
Frankly it's a PITA (using gmail) to remember to switch to plain tex
7 matches
Mail list logo
