Re: [NF] Mac Ad

2008-02-22 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 22, 2008, at 4:00 AM, Gil Hale wrote: > Yeah, they all pretty much equally suck in terms of being easy to > use when > compared to modern editors. Even though I don't use them regularly, studies repeatedly show that (after the learning curve) both vi and emacs make their users

RE: [NF] Mac Ad

2008-02-22 Thread Gil Hale
age- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Crozier > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 4:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [NF] Mac Ad > > > No No No, there is only one editor that can VI for attention as the best. > > Dave Cr

RE: [NF] Mac Ad

2008-02-22 Thread Dave Crozier
No No No, there is only one editor that can VI for attention as the best. Dave Crozier -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gil Hale Sent: 22 February 2008 09:20 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] Mac Ad > Nah, real programmers

RE: [NF] Mac Ad

2008-02-22 Thread Gil Hale
Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:38 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Mac Ad > > > On Feb 21, 2008, at 8:01 PM, Mike Wohlrab wrote: > > > Ed, here is a good Mac ad for you! > > > > http://xkcd.com/378/ > > > Nah, real programmers use BBE

Re: [NF] Mac Ad

2008-02-21 Thread Ed Leafe
On Feb 21, 2008, at 8:01 PM, Mike Wohlrab wrote: > Ed, here is a good Mac ad for you! > > http://xkcd.com/378/ Nah, real programmers use BBEdit! http://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/ -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@l

[NF] Mac Ad

2008-02-21 Thread Mike Wohlrab
Ed, here is a good Mac ad for you! http://xkcd.com/378/ Mike Wohlrab Computer Technology Solutions 585-944-3823 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.mikewohlrab.com ftp://mikewohlrab.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leaf