oh no not the green dress again please :)
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Vince Teachout
>
Ed, you foolish naive -- sex can be VERY tech-related! I have pictures to
prove it. :)
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked
Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Mar 2, 2008, at 8:42 AM, Man-wai Chang wrote:
>
>
>>> Guys - we went from discussing Microsoft, Intel and Vista ([NF
>>> stuff]) to protectionism, Walmart, and layoffs. Time to move it [OT].
>>>
>> Don't we all need business ethics and social responsibilities? :)
On Mar 2, 2008, at 8:42 AM, Man-wai Chang wrote:
>> Guys - we went from discussing Microsoft, Intel and Vista ([NF
>> stuff]) to protectionism, Walmart, and layoffs. Time to move it [OT].
>
> Don't we all need business ethics and social responsibilities? :)
Sure, but we all need sex
> Guys - we went from discussing Microsoft, Intel and Vista ([NF
> stuff]) to protectionism, Walmart, and layoffs. Time to move it [OT].
Don't we all need business ethics and social responsibilities? :)
--
@~@http://changmw.homeip.net
/ v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! L
On Feb 29, 2008, at 8:55 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> Your confusing threads here Michael. This has nothing to do with
> employees. Purely getting a product to market and how they could
> achieve
> success.
>
> Walmart = Wally World
Guys - we went from discussing Microsoft, Intel and
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 3:42 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account
> You could insert ANY name in your comment besides WalMart for big
> corporate America. THAT is the problem...they have no respect for their
> own worker...the almighty dollar is #1, #2, and probably fills up the
> top 10.
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 8:42 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Russell wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:40 AM, David Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I thought it was interesting that Walmart saw what was going on, didn't
> >> like
Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:40 AM, David Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>> I thought it was interesting that Walmart saw what was going on, didn't
>> like
>> it, and then not being able to convince MS to change the 'Vista-Ready'
>> branding went to the manufacturer
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 7:40 AM, David Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I thought it was interesting that Walmart saw what was going on, didn't
> like
> it, and then not being able to convince MS to change the 'Vista-Ready'
> branding went to the manufacturer directly. Their reason? They knew th
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [NF] Microsoft Integrity
>
>
> I thought it was interesting that Walmart saw what was going on,
> didn't like
> it, and then not being able to convince MS to change the 'Vista-Ready'
> branding went to the manufacturer directl
;m impressed.
David Smith
Systems Administrator
Doan Family of Dealerships
(585) 352-6600 ext.1730
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NF] Micro
Gil Hale wrote:
> Hmmm, "Microsoft Integrity", "Military Intelligence". Me thinks there is a
> pattern here somewhere, but I am having a hard time getting a grasp on it.
>
> I wonder if this will ever hit prime time news. Well, on second thought it
> is not nearly as important as Paris Hilton get
photographed in the nude
(2 years ago, no less). Now THAT is certainly newsworthy! ...
Gil
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 5:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subjec
http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/28/microsoft-lowered-vista-requirements-to-help-intel-sell-incompat/
( -or- http://tinyurl.com/yuxrjq )
From TFA:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
...although Intel's 915 chipset was initially rejected as compatible
with Vis
14 matches
Mail list logo
