Stephen Russell wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2008 17:16, Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 01:10 PM 3/28/2008 -0300, Helio W. wrote:
He doesn't indicate other sources, documents, etc. He just mention
Jesus,
respectfully like any
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 21:08, Stephen Russell wrote:
It was not easy to write in those days prior to Leland's $8 spell
checker. I
think the then current existence of four active authors (they were not
collected into the New Testament until much later) would be a
disincentive for other
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 21:06, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
Jesus was with them for a month + after his death till Pentecost. Why
wouldn't he return in a couple of weeks?
After being in Heaven, why would he return to a bunch of smelly
desert
Ed wrote:
OK, let's see if I understand this right. There's a revolution
against the Tsar in Russia, and the events of that revolution are
recorded. A few years later, as the result of internal political
infighting, some of the records are changed to eliminate the
participation of some
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
I thought that there were a few versions of the Gospels we know of
today as
well as other Gospels that were discounted and not considered part
of the
official set of
The old missing spell checker routine; profain?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: profox@leafe.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 9:05 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] Jesus, man or myth?
To the profain, everything is profain. It's that thing about seeing
things through our
On Apr 2, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
When you have slight variations of the same story, or the order is
different
between one group and another these are what was set straight. The
catechism defines most of this as being the only rule book out there .
Ah, but we
The old missing spell checker routine; profain?
Hey... I got that $8 spell checker for half price at Costco.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
message/rfc822
---
On Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:09 AM Pete Theisen wrote:
Stream of conciseness, that is interesting. But the individual spirit
or spirit stuff was the distinction I was looking for.
Can you conceive of God being one of the individual spirits?
No. God is the stream. People have different meanings
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 2, 2008, at 8:09 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
When you have slight variations of the same story, or the order is
different
between one group and another these are what was set straight. The
catechism defines most of
On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
First explanation:
When you have slight variations of the same story, or the order is
different
between one group and another these are what was set straight. The
catechism defines most of this as being the only rule book out
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
First explanation:
When you have slight variations of the same story, or the order is
different
between one group and another these are what was set straight. The
On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
That doesn't change the setting the consistent version. You are
talking
about an oral society.
Then please stop talking about proof or anything even remotely
resembling proof. This is nothing more than the game of Operator
First, let me say I'm a believer; baptized a Presbyterian in Baird,
Texas about the age of 14, but I'm currently a member of a Methodist
Church in Abilene, Texas. I found God through faith in the Bible, faith
in my Brother and Sisters in Christ, faith in the works and miracles of
other
If god manifest himself on earth and became more personally
involved in his works, then all people would believe and know
that God is God, and there would be no need for doubt,
acceptance of God by faith, or need to complete God's works
through other people.
I deserve that, I am sure God
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:11 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
That doesn't change the setting the consistent version. You are
talking
about an oral society.
Then please stop talking about proof or anything even remotely
Ed wrote:
It's fine that you and others have your own beliefs. The only
objection that I and others have is when you try to insist that others
accept these beliefs as historical facts.
You don't have to accept anything, but you do have to accept the consequences.
If you were truly as
On Apr 2, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
Do you agree with the fact that scrolls are not as permanent a form of
documentation that would easily endure for thousands of years? If
that was
the primary method of documentation why do you keep expecting it to
have
lasted? Are
Eurico Chagas Filho wrote:
If god manifest himself on earth and became more personally
involved in his works, then all people would believe and know
that God is God, and there would be no need for doubt,
acceptance of God by faith, or need to complete God's works
through other people.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And on and on we go. To Discuss religion is an exercise in futility.
A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest
imaginary friend.
A+
jml
___
Post Messages to:
On Apr 2, 2008, at 1:10 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
And on and on we go. To Discuss religion is an exercise in futility.
A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest
imaginary friend.
I'm not debating beliefs. I'm simply trying to stop the confusion
that
On Wednesday, April 02, 2008 2:41 PM Ed Leafe wrote:
I'm not debating beliefs. I'm simply trying to stop the confusion
that Stephen and some others have between belief and fact.
A belief is just a thought that is thought over and over again.
There are many ways to look at facts and in this
Since God is all powerful, it seem like this would be a simple,
direct way to solve all doubts, so I'm puzzled why he works anonymously,
requiring acceptance through faith, and working through other people,
rather than performing his works personally himself, as he is certainly
capable of
on or you will be
taught to fly.
-Edward Teller
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [HYPERLINK
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed
Leafe
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 1:42 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Jesus, man or myth?
On Apr 2
Ed wrote:
I'm not debating beliefs. I'm simply trying to stop the confusion
that Stephen and some others have between belief and fact.
The difference is that Ed believes it... like global warming... it's fact. If
we believe otherwise, it's belief.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report --
David Crooks wrote:
On Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:09 AM Pete Theisen wrote:
Stream of conciseness, that is interesting. But the individual spirit
or spirit stuff was the distinction I was looking for.
Can you conceive of God being one of the individual spirits?
No. God is the stream.
Stephen Russell wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:40 AM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 2, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
First explanation:
When you have slight variations of the same story, or the order is
different
between one group and another these are what
On Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:55 PM Ricardo Araoz wrote:
David, when something is everywhere then it is nowhere. If everybody
has special powers then nobody has special powers (because they
are no longer special). So what you are really saying is that god does
not exist.
As it said on a Jethro
On Apr 2, 2008, at 2:31 PM, David Crooks wrote:
There are many ways to look at facts and in this case, Ed, you seem to
be looking for historical facts where there are few, if any around.
The
Christian church has controlled (which is what religions do - control
you) the facts for over the
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 13:46, Leland F. Jackson, CPA wrote:
I'm saying that God could settle all arguments, contentions between
different religions, and doubts, as well as stopping all the killing and
pain that is going on in his name, by simple manifesting himself in his
natural state
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Eurico Chagas Filho
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If god manifest himself on earth and became more personally
involved in his works, then all people would believe and know
that God is God, and there would be no need for doubt,
acceptance of God by faith, or
Jean Laeremans wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And on and on we go. To Discuss religion is an exercise in futility.
A religious war is like children fighting over who has the strongest
imaginary friend.
That's easy, MY imaginary friend is the
On Monday 31 March 2008 17:16, Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 01:10 PM 3/28/2008 -0300, Helio W. wrote:
He doesn't indicate other sources, documents, etc. He just mention Jesus,
respectfully like any evangelist would do.
Probably his citation of Jesus is an interpolation.
Josephus was actually a
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Charlie Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 01:10 PM 3/28/2008 -0300, Helio W. wrote:
He doesn't indicate other sources, documents, etc. He just mention Jesus,
respectfully like any evangelist would do.
Probably his citation of Jesus is an interpolation.
On Apr 1, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
Jesus was with them for a month + after his death till Pentecost. Why
wouldn't he return in a couple of weeks?
After being in Heaven, why would he return to a bunch of smelly
desert guys? Are you saying he's stupid?
Why did it
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Pete Theisen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Monday 31 March 2008 17:16, Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 01:10 PM 3/28/2008 -0300, Helio W. wrote:
He doesn't indicate other sources, documents, etc. He just mention
Jesus,
respectfully like any evangelist would do.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
And the dues. Don't forget that collecting the dues from the new
membership must have taken up a lot of their time.
-
Dues, you don't know
On Apr 1, 2008, at 9:08 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
I thought that there were a few versions of the Gospels we know of
today as
well as other Gospels that were discounted and not considered part
of the
official set of texts. So the leaders of the church took it upon
themselves
to set
On Apr 1, 2008, at 9:17 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
Dues, you don't know the half of it? Acts 5:
Sounds like modern-day Iraq.
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
Just back from vacation. I want to weigh in on this:
__stephen's original question: Jesus, man or myth? I believe that the
answer is Yes. Remember, myth doesn't mean something that is made
up. Marion-Webster: a usually traditional story of ostensibly
historical events that serves to unfold
On Friday, March 28, 2008 7:48 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
When the physical experience is over, what happens to the spiritual
being? Is it still the same spirit or does it become spirit non-
material, losing its individual spiritness?
I do not claim to be an expert in Metaphysics, so I am not sure
At 04:22 PM 3/26/2008 -0500, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Mar 26, 2008, at 2:41 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
What do you want his passport with the stamp from Egypt that his father got
when he was an infant?
How about some original texts that describe a 33-year-old unmarried
rabbi from that
On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:03 PM, Charlie Coleman wrote:
Actually, it wasn't uncommon to be 33 years old and unmarried. Perhaps
rare, but certainly not unique.
With a lifespan of about 45 or so, it was nearly unheard of.
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post
At 01:10 PM 3/28/2008 -0300, Helio W. wrote:
He doesn't indicate other sources, documents, etc. He just mention Jesus,
respectfully like any evangelist would do.
Probably his citation of Jesus is an interpolation.
Josephus was actually a fairly strong source in regards to historical facts
(in
David Crooks wrote:
On Friday, March 28, 2008 7:48 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
When the physical experience is over, what happens to the spiritual
being? Is it still the same spirit or does it become spirit non-
material, losing its individual spiritness?
I do not claim to be an expert in
Ed wrote:
Actually, it wasn't uncommon to be 33 years old and unmarried. Perhaps
rare, but certainly not unique.
With a lifespan of about 45 or so, it was nearly unheard of.
I guess he was there to hear... or in this case unhear of it. I guess it's OK
to deviate from the norm today, but in
On Monday 31 March 2008 14:21, David Crooks wrote:
On Friday, March 28, 2008 7:48 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
When the physical experience is over, what happens to the spiritual
being? Is it still the same spirit or does it become spirit non-
material, losing its individual spiritness?
I do not
Oh the irony.
::michael
Ricardo Araoz wrote:
You missed Ricardoism.
It's about a benevolent and humorous god that only hates stupidity. If
you are stupid you'll be condemned to spend eternity surrounded by the
likes of Mikey boy (talk about punishment).
Michael Oke, II wrote:
Oh the irony.
LOL
::michael
Ricardo Araoz wrote:
You missed Ricardoism.
It's about a benevolent and humorous god that only hates stupidity. If
you are stupid you'll be condemned to spend eternity surrounded by the
likes of Mikey boy (talk about punishment).
Maybe Ricardo should have been a christian then.
HW
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's about a benevolent and humorous god that only hates stupidity. If
you are stupid you'll be condemned to spend eternity surrounded by the
likes of Mikey boy (talk about
John Harvey wrote:
The Japanese obviously aren't divine, because they die.
So did Jesus
Yes, but He lives.
Sorry? He's DEAD. He can not be dead and live, that's plain stupid.
Their emperor likewise.
So did Mary, Paul and oh so many others.
They didn't claim to be divine.
The
John Harvey wrote:
Was that Rickey Ricardoism?
JH
I don't get english very well. Are you proposing to be my Lucy?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this
Helio W. wrote:
Maybe Ricardo should have been a christian then.
HW
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 12:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's about a benevolent and humorous god that only hates stupidity. If
you are stupid you'll be condemned to spend eternity surrounded by the
likes of Mikey
Maybe Ricardo should have been a christian then.
Nah... only sharp people figure it out.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
message/rfc822
---
Sharp people like these
guys?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Of90cKxSeuwfeature=related
HW
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 11:34 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe Ricardo should have been a christian then.
Nah... only sharp people figure it out.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed
Of Ricardo Araoz
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 5:45 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Jesus, man or myth?
Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/SGSI wrote:
Why is Josephus pathetically weak? Explain please.
He never worked out?
Charles Atlas dixit.
[excessive quoting removed by server
snip
Surely if you measure by their life, both the Buddha and Confucius
both have the numbers to dwarf Jesus.
Are you sure?
v/r
//SIGNED//
Stephen S. Wolfe, YA2, DAF
6th MDG Data Services Manager
6th MDG Information System Security Officer
Comm (813) 827-9994 DSN 651-9994
Pretty funny is that all that christians have are biblical sources,
usually written decades after Jesus suposedly existed. There should be some
historical evidence, from varioius sources, from the time Jesus lived and
died. Not lies written by people spreading the faith/myth.
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008
Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Jesus, man or myth?
Weak. Pathetically weak.
Anything else?
HW
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:40 PM, John Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Do a google search on Flavius Josephus for one.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Surely if you measure by their life, both the Buddha and Confucius
both have the numbers to dwarf Jesus.
Are you sure?
I think that 'fact' came from the Hillary Clinton Almanac.
--
Larry Miller
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/mixed
multipart/alternative
On Mar 28, 2008, at 10:52 AM, Wolfe, Stephen S Civ USAF AMC 6 MDSS/
SGSI wrote:
Surely if you measure by their life, both the Buddha and Confucius
both have the numbers to dwarf Jesus.
Are you sure?
It isn't even close. The sheer populations of the respective areas
are just about
On Friday 28 March 2008 11:01, Helio W. wrote:
Pretty funny is that all that christians have are biblical sources,
usually written decades after Jesus suposedly existed. There should be some
historical evidence, from varioius sources, from the time Jesus lived and
died. Not lies written by
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Pretty funny is that all that christians have are biblical sources,
usually written decades after Jesus suposedly existed. There should be
some
historical evidence, from varioius sources, from the time Jesus lived and
died.
On Mar 28, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
The Jews in power forbade the telling of the story of Jesus in a way
of
squelching it. Those that were caught were beaten and told not to
continue. If scrolls were found they were destroyed.
And you don't see that that pretty
Very convenient. But then you concur there's absolutely no way to proof
Jesus' life was a historical truth.
HW
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Helio W. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Pretty funny is that all that
On Mar 28, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Helio W. wrote:
Very convenient. But then you concur there's absolutely no way to
proof
Jesus' life was a historical truth.
Just as there's no way to prove that Joseph Smith didn't really have
golden plates from God!
-- Ed Leafe
On Friday 28 March 2008 12:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your religion values faith much more than knowledge, so why can't you
just accept that the Jesus story is a matter of faith, and that's all
you need? Why the impulse to convince others using so-called proof?
Because we don't want to see
Hi
The Japanese think themselves as a divine people.
They are very sure that the emperor is a God.
The Buddhist think that Buda was an Avatar.
Mohamed said that he was the only prophet of his God Allah.
The Jews believe that they are the chosen one's of their God Jehovah.
The Christians believe
I'm a Christian, but I do hold out hope for anyone who
believes in God. Even the Agnostics have a chance, in
my opinion.
I have great fear for Atheists however. My uncle has
been an avowed Atheist his whole life and he's getting
near the end. I pray for his soul and hope he
reconsiders. I
And some of them are probably wrong, but are they all
wrong? Want to take that chance?
Christians believe there will be a conversion of the
Jews right before the second coming. I would argue
that there will be a conversion of anyone who opens
his mind. Will your mind be open or will you go
On Friday, March 28, 2008 2:05 PM Michael Madigan wrote:
And some of them are probably wrong, but are they all wrong? Want to
take that chance?
And they are...
Christians believe there will be a conversion of the Jews right
before the second coming. I would argue that there will be a
And that's the crux of your problem.
--- David Crooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have never felt like I have needed to be saved by
anything. YMMV
David L. Crooks
Kwame Kilpatrick Gear!
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 28, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
The Jews in power forbade the telling of the story of Jesus in a way
of
squelching it. Those that were caught were beaten and told not to
continue. If scrolls were
On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
I wonder why anyone would present a hoax like this and become a
potential
martyr? Or was that all false as well?
Wrong question.
Ask yourself whether a group intent on growing their power base would
create such a myth
Hi Michael
You convinced me, I am saved. I embrace your faith, JC is my God from now
on and God is a hermaphrodite being who can have a child with no mother, or
whatever.
But, rest assure that I am going to pray every hour till the day of my
demise.
God, both of them, will be very pleased and
You're joking, right?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
---
I thought that Jesus had to stretch the minds of everyone so they
understood
why he was there. He trashed the Jews in some cases and elevated the
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
I wonder why anyone would present a hoax like this and become a
potential
martyr? Or was that all false as well?
Wrong question.
Ask yourself whether
It really doesn't sound like you're sincere.
--- Eurico Chagas Filho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Michael
You convinced me, I am saved. I embrace your faith,
JC is my God from now
on and God is a hermaphrodite being who can have a
child with no mother, or
whatever.
But, rest assure
On Friday, March 28, 2008 2:42 PM Michael Madigan wrote:
And that's the crux of your problem.
No problem here... I prefer to be a spiritual being following my path
than trying to follow any teachings from 2,000 years ago (or more). I
believe that I am an eternal being in physical form.
David
And the Jews don't deny Jesus lived, just that he
wasn't the son of God.
--- Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Ed Leafe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Stephen Russell
wrote:
I wonder why anyone would present a hoax like
] Jesus, man or myth?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
I wonder why anyone would present a hoax like this and become a
potential
martyr? Or was that all false as well?
Wrong question
Filho
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 12:39 PM
To: 'ProFox Email List'
Subject: RE: [OT] Jesus, man or myth?
Hi
The Japanese think themselves as a divine people.
They are very sure that the emperor is a God.
The Buddhist think that Buda was an Avatar.
Mohamed said that he was the only prophet of his God
On Mar 28, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
If this is a hoax why would the Muslims agree to the existence of it?
Fair enough question. Let's see... at that time there were a
significant number of people in the Christian movement, so they did
the same thing that the
On Mar 28, 2008, at 2:19 PM, John Harvey wrote:
Not to mention the fact that it was such a great hoax that we count
our
years and days based on Jesus's death.
No, based on his birth.
That's what happens when you mix religion and government. At the time
that the current
On Friday 28 March 2008 14:10, David Crooks wrote:
On Friday, March 28, 2008 2:42 PM Michael Madigan wrote:
And that's the crux of your problem.
No problem here... I prefer to be a spiritual being following my path
than trying to follow any teachings from 2,000 years ago (or more). I
believe
On Friday 28 March 2008 14:11, Michael Madigan wrote:
And the Jews don't deny Jesus lived, just that he
wasn't the son of God.
Hi Michael!
I think it is interesting that the earliest heresies denied not that Jesus was
eternally God but that he had ever been human.
--
Regards,
Pete
On Friday, March 28, 2008 5:00 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
Do you? Can you conceive of any others who are also like you?
Yeah. Of course, there are millions like me. I am like the pope - just
a man - flesh and blood... g
David L. Crooks
___
Post
On Friday 28 March 2008 14:58, David Crooks wrote:
On Friday, March 28, 2008 5:00 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
Do you? Can you conceive of any others who are also like you?
Yeah. Of course, there are millions like me. I am like the pope - just
a man - flesh and blood... g
Hi David!
You aren't
On Friday, March 28, 2008 5:29 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
You aren't really trying to duck the eternal in physical form part,
are you.
What happens to the eternal being after the physical form passes away?
It is like a bucket of water poured into the ocean...
David L. Crooks
On Friday 28 March 2008 15:24, David Crooks wrote:
On Friday, March 28, 2008 5:29 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
You aren't really trying to duck the eternal in physical form part,
are you.
What happens to the eternal being after the physical form passes away?
It is like a bucket of water poured
On Friday, March 28, 2008 5:58 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
Then it isn't really an eternal being, it is a temporary being made of
eternal stuff, slightly different.
A spiritual being having a physical experience if you want...
David L. Crooks
___
Post
Eurico Chagas Filho wrote:
Hi
The Japanese think themselves as a divine people.
They are very sure that the emperor is a God.
The Buddhist think that Buda was an Avatar.
Mohamed said that he was the only prophet of his God Allah.
The Jews believe that they are the chosen one's of their God
On Friday 28 March 2008 15:52, David Crooks wrote:
On Friday, March 28, 2008 5:58 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
Then it isn't really an eternal being, it is a temporary being made of
eternal stuff, slightly different.
A spiritual being having a physical experience if you want...
Hi David!
When
John Harvey wrote:
The Japanese obviously aren't divine, because they die.
So did Jesus
Their emperor likewise.
So did Mary, Paul and oh so many others.
The Buddhist don't use computers.
Neither did Jesus.
Mohamed is in the ground.
As are all past Christians, Jesus included.
The Jews
David Crooks wrote:
On Friday, March 28, 2008 5:00 PM Pete Theisen wrote:
Do you? Can you conceive of any others who are also like you?
Yeah. Of course, there are millions like me. I am like the pope - just
a man - flesh and blood... g
I'm better than the pope. At least I don't have
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 28, 2008, at 2:04 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
If this is a hoax why would the Muslims agree to the existence of it?
Fair enough question. Let's see... at that time there were a
significant number of people in
On Mar 28, 2008, at 7:40 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
They even site the only woman in the Koran as Mary.
I'm sure that they are all in cahoots and your one of the few in the
world
who are not duped.
Oh, OK. The Jesus story is a complete copy of the Mithra story, down
to the
The Japanese obviously aren't divine, because they die.
So did Jesus
Yes, but He lives.
Their emperor likewise.
So did Mary, Paul and oh so many others.
They didn't claim to be divine.
The Buddhist don't use computers.
Neither did Jesus.
Didn't need them.
Mohamed is in the ground.
As
Was that Rickey Ricardoism?
JH
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ricardo Araoz
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 5:37 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Jesus, man or myth?
Eurico Chagas Filho wrote:
Hi
The Japanese think themselves
It's about a benevolent and humorous god that only hates stupidity. If
you are stupid you'll be condemned to spend eternity surrounded by the
likes of Mikey boy (talk about punishment).
If, under your system, stupidity will get you in trouble, Ricardo... you're in
a heap of trouble, boy.
--
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
