http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3989147.html
New Lower Prices *
Horse Racing Photos at http://michaelmadigan.exposuremanager.com/
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/list
Michael Madigan wrote:
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3989147.html
In related news, the U.N. will try to ensure that unneeded deaths like
this do not continue.
http://www.hawaiireporter.com/story.aspx?9dcc90ec-c64d-40a4-a3c9-a4edd3e332d6
Of course if they had any author
I don't think a majority of UN ambassador would support a UN law that
made small arm defensive weapons illegal. The right to self defense
should be a fundamental right. Even if such a law were passed, it would
be impossible to enforced. Can you imagine trying to disarm the
citizens of Iraq,
I would be happier if the UN made wmd illegal for every country around
the world, including the US. Then we could begin disarming the nuclear,
chemical, and biological weapon that could lead to extenstion of the
human race.
Regards,
LelandJ
Jason wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
http://ww
After all the wmd have been destroyed, the UN could make war illegal. LOL
Regards,
LelandJ
Leland Jackson wrote:
I would be happier if the UN made wmd illegal for every country around
the world, including the US. Then we could begin disarming the
nuclear, chemical, and biological weapon th
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 21 June 2006 18:57
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3989147.html
New Lower Prices *
Horse R
22 June 2006 07:50
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life
Huh!! It saves one life, by claiming aother like in the process.
If neither one had been armed with guns, both would have survived. I
don't see your point.
Regards
Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP
OTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: 21 June 2006 18:57
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life
>
> http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/headline/metro/3989147.html
>
> New Lower Prices ***
omplicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies." -- Tony Hoare, Turing Award Lecture 1980
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 22 June 2006 08:14
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life
Dominic Burford wrote:
Huh!! It saves one life, by claiming aother like in the process.
If neither one had been armed with guns, both would have survived. I
don't see your point.
Hi Dominic!
The criminals *will* be armed with guns. Naive to expect them not to be.
Regards,
Pete
_
Dominic Burford wrote:
<< Because the criminal will always have the gun and only the
law-abiding would turn their's in.
That is not the point you were making. You posted a link to an
article which you indicated described how a gun saved a life. The
story describes how a burglar is killed by t
re, Turing Award Lecture 1980
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of petetheisen
Sent: 22 June 2006 09:46
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life
Dominic Burford wrote:
> Huh!! It saves one life, by claiming aother
ch" - Bill
Bryson
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of petetheisen
Sent: 22 June 2006 09:59
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life
Dominic Burford wrote:
> << Because the criminal will always have
petetheisen <> wrote:
> Every lawfully owned gun has saved many lives, and will continue to
> save more lives, usually by deterrence. Every burglar is a murder
> waiting to happen, the sooner each burglar is killed, or scared
> straight, the better. It would be nice if the police would kill them
Whoops, I was referring to an extinction level event here.Sorry
Pete, but I bet you to this one; although, I'm sure I will still hear
something from you.
Regards,
LelandJ
Leland Jackson wrote:
I would be happier if the UN made wmd illegal for every country around
the world, including th
1980
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Michael Madigan
> Sent: 22 June 2006 08:14
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: RE: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life
>
> Because the criminal will always have the g
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of petetheisen
> Sent: 22 June 2006 09:46
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life
>
> Dominic Burford wrote:
> > Huh!! It saves
gt;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of petetheisen
> Sent: 22 June 2006 09:46
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Once again a gun saves a life
>
> Dominic Burford wrote:
> > Huh!! It saves
Dominic Burford wrote:
Hi Dominic!
Your point is wrong, the criminal will have a gun and he will kill -
however you might wish otherwise, but your point is beside the point anyway.
This is *WAY* too important to split hairs about what argument Michael
may or may not have been making. The fac
s to make it so complicated that there are no obvious
deficiencies." -- Tony Hoare, Turing Award Lecture 1980
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of petetheisen
Sent: 22 June 2006 11:07
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] Once again a gun s
Dave Crozier wrote:
we should all go out and buy f*ck off big rocket propelled grenade
launchers and we'd all be completely safe in our homes. Dominic is
perfectly correct in his statement regarding the absence
Hi Dave!
Dominic is never correct about guns :-)
RPGs have too much power for home
Stephen the Cook wrote:
You are a very disturbed man Pete.
Hi Stephen!
Disturbed? I used to be disturbed but a psychiatrist cured me. I used to
even wear a funny hat, but no more.
Regards,
Pete
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscript
On 6/23/06, petetheisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The criminals *will* be tooled up as you put it. We have to be ready.
Seems to me that the UK and Australia have taken away the guns.
They were never really taken away as few had them in the first place.
I don't know anyone who has owned a gun.
Paul Hill wrote:
On 6/23/06, petetheisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The criminals *will* be tooled up as you put it. We have to be
ready. Seems to me that the UK and Australia have taken away the
guns.
They were never really taken away as few had them in the first place.
I don't know anyone w
On 6/24/06, petetheisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I didn't say "gun crime", I said crime. Crime is up in the UK and
Australia, or at least it is reported to be.
Which is nothing to do with the changes in gun laws. As I said, in
the UK it's extremely rare (and always has been) to own a gun.
Paul Hill wrote:
On 6/24/06, petetheisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I didn't say "gun crime", I said crime. Crime is up in the UK and
Australia, or at least it is reported to be.
Which is nothing to do with the changes in gun laws. As I said, in
the UK it's extremely rare (and always has b
26 matches
Mail list logo
