RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-06 Thread Adam Buckland
Yup, both of me are... -Original Message- From: Michael Madigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 July 2006 17:36 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 So you're schizophrenic. It all makes sense now. This email and any files transm

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-05 Thread Michael Madigan
e: > > > Nope, my psychiatrist says I'm a moron for arguing > > with cretins... > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Madigan > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 05 July 2006 09:04 > > To: ProFox Email L

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-05 Thread john harvey
> From: Michael Madigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 July 2006 09:04 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for > June, 2006 > > I always thought of you as more as an cretin:) > > --- Adam Buckland <[EM

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-05 Thread Michael Madigan
TED] > Sent: 05 July 2006 09:04 > To: ProFox Email List > Subject: RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for > June, 2006 > > I always thought of you as more as an cretin:) > > --- Adam Buckland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > I suppose Ed does have

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-05 Thread Hal Kaplan
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 14:22 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 Addionally, Ed has basically called Dominic, Kris, Bill, Jim, Leland, Hal, and Adam "morons" for

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-05 Thread Adam Buckland
Nope, my psychiatrist says I'm a moron for arguing with cretins... -Original Message- From: Michael Madigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 July 2006 09:04 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 I always thought of you as more

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-05 Thread Michael Madigan
I always thought of you as more as an cretin:) --- Adam Buckland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suppose Ed does have a point though. > > > > -Original Message- > From: Michael Madigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Addionally, Ed has basically called Dominic, Kris, > Bill, Jim, Lel

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-05 Thread Adam Buckland
I suppose Ed does have a point though. -Original Message- From: Michael Madigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Addionally, Ed has basically called Dominic, Kris, Bill, Jim, Leland, Hal, and Adam "morons" for conversing with me. It must be tough being so much smarter than everyone else.

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-05 Thread Michael Madigan
On > Behalf Of Kristyne McDaniel > Sent: 04 July 2006 18:11 > To: 'ProFox Email List' > Subject: RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for > June, 2006 > > And to both Dominic and Bob, please remember to trim > your posts... > > -- Kris > www.shamrocktr

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-05 Thread Dominic Burford
ED] On Behalf Of Kristyne McDaniel Sent: 04 July 2006 18:11 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 And to both Dominic and Bob, please remember to trim your posts... -- Kris www.shamrocktrails.com __

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-04 Thread Michael Madigan
Must be before my time. --- Kristyne McDaniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Madigan, > > > Addionally, Ed has basically called Dominic, Kris, > > Bill, Jim, Leland, Hal, and Adam "morons" for > > conversing with me. > > No, he's not calling us morons. He's just reminding > us that we are only

Re: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-04 Thread petetheisen
Bob Calco wrote: * We need to give Israel back to the Palestinians and send the Jews back where they came from (presumably New York) Hi Bob! The Jews that migrated to what is now Israel mainly were war refugees and Nazi death camp survivors. This is where Bill really seems to want them to be

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-04 Thread Kristyne McDaniel
Madigan, > Addionally, Ed has basically called Dominic, Kris, > Bill, Jim, Leland, Hal, and Adam "morons" for > conversing with me. No, he's not calling us morons. He's just reminding us that we are only annoying the pig, if you remember the old saying. -- Kris www.shamrocktrails.com __

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 [OT]

2006-07-04 Thread Michael Madigan
Right on target. > "Rational discourse" on this list is just a code > phrase for "very left". http://www.ImpeachJonCorzine.com Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 [OT]

2006-07-04 Thread petetheisen
Chet Gardiner wrote: Ah, "on and on"...you mean attempting rational discourse rather than regurgitating bogus right-wing talking points. This continues the drift [OT] begun by others... :-) Hi Chet! Adding the [OT] it probably should have had several posts ago. Oh, wait, now neither you no

Re: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-04 Thread Michael Madigan
It's amazing how non-introspective some people are. They believe they are so thoughtful in their posts and that others aren't. An 8-page Kaczynski-like diatribe which basically boils down to, "the evil Jews control the world", is far less productive than a few one-lines that gets to the point.

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-04 Thread Bill Arnold
> At least Bill experiments with ways to rephrase and reformulate these > points, and persuade people who disagree with his perspective > of their wisdom, mostly without rancor---that's what's to his > credit. (I half expect him now to go point-by-point through > my list of gross oversimplif

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-04 Thread Kristyne McDaniel
And to both Dominic and Bob, please remember to trim your posts... -- Kris www.shamrocktrails.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/

RE: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-04 Thread Dominic Burford
IL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Calco Sent: 04 July 2006 15:17 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: [OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 Chet: I give Bill credit for attempting rational discourse, however, I've not seen ANYTHING but vitriolic left-wing rhetorical hit pieces from y

[OT] RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-04 Thread Bob Calco
f that energy was actually used to raise the level of discussion, rather than just bemoan or condemn it and blame one or two people for scaring away the so-called, self-proclaimed smart folk. - Bob ! -Original Message- ! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ! [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-04 Thread Chet Gardiner
Ah, "on and on"...you mean attempting rational discourse rather than regurgitating bogus right-wing talking points. This continues the drift [OT] begun by others... :-) petetheisen wrote: Bill Arnold wrote: Total [OT] Posts: 1983 (Up 135.51% relative to May, 2006) [shudder!]

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread petetheisen
Bill Arnold wrote: Total [OT] Posts: 1983 (Up 135.51% relative to May, 2006) [shudder!] That is remarkable. So glad I don't get to see OT. Just the statistics amaze me. And I thought I posted too much! I trust folks like you and Ed do see the irony here: ProFox was established beca

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jul 3, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Bill Arnold wrote: Ed has said many times that the community must regulate itself, and it is in that spirit that I'm offering to say that we have a problem with the quality of the list being under attack by volume, be it intentional or otherwise. Volume i

RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread Michael Madigan
What? --- Hal Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't thank me, Madigan. Thank your state's elected > leaders for being > unable to compromise. http://www.ImpeachJonCorzine.com Horse Racing Photos at http://www.HorseRacingPix.com ___ Post Messag

RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread Hal Kaplan
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 15:25 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 Thanks Hal, I'm surprised at Bill's choice of words. Perhaps the flood has gotten to him and he's said something he would

RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread Hal Kaplan
] On Behalf Of Bill Arnold Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 14:34 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 > And that, I believe, is why Ed agreed to filter the OT messages, so > that we could censor ourselves. > > I respect your opinion, Bil

RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread Michael Madigan
iginal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Bill Arnold > Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:41 > To: 'ProFox Email List' > Subject: RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 > > > > > > Total [OT] Posts: 1983 > >

RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread Bill Arnold
> And that, I believe, is why Ed agreed to filter the OT > messages, so that we could censor ourselves. > > I respect your opinion, Bill, but I don't see the problem > here. To me, the Ots are a quick way to get some serious > surfing done by other people and reap the benefits without > mu

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread MB Software Solutions
Hal Kaplan wrote: And that, I believe, is why Ed agreed to filter the OT messages, so that we could censor ourselves. I respect your opinion, Bill, but I don't see the problem here. To me, the Ots are a quick way to get some serious surfing done by other people and reap the benefits without

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread MB Software Solutions
Bill Arnold wrote: I trust folks like you and Ed do see the irony here: ProFox was established because freedom of speech was under assault. That's Darcy White's legacy, eh? ;-) Wonder what he does nowadays? -- Michael J. Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC http://mbsoftwaresolutions.c

RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread Hal Kaplan
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Arnold Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:41 To: 'ProFox Email List' Subject: RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 > > > Total [OT] Posts: 1983 > > > (Up 135.51% relative to May, 2006) > > > >

RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread Bill Arnold
> > > Total [OT] Posts: 1983 > > > (Up 135.51% relative to May, 2006) > > > > [shudder!] > > > > That is remarkable. So glad I don't get to see OT. Just the > statistics amaze me. And I thought I posted too much! I trust folks like you and Ed do see the irony here: ProFox was establish

RE: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-03 Thread Tristan Leask
: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 Subject: Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006 On Jul 1, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Ted Roche wrote: > That is remarkable. So glad I don't get to see OT. Just the statistics > amaze me. And I thought I posted too much! I think it clearly demon

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-01 Thread Jason Lanquist
Ed Leafe wrote: On Jul 1, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Ted Roche wrote: That is remarkable. So glad I don't get to see OT. Just the statistics amaze me. And I thought I posted too much! I think it clearly demonstrates the negative correlation between quantity and quality. I would hope people lo

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-01 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jul 1, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Ted Roche wrote: That is remarkable. So glad I don't get to see OT. Just the statistics amaze me. And I thought I posted too much! I think it clearly demonstrates the negative correlation between quantity and quality. I would hope people look at these stats and

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-01 Thread Ted Roche
On 7/1/06, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Jul 1, 2006, at 7:03 AM, List Administrator Account wrote: > Total [OT] Posts: 1983 > (Up 135.51% relative to May, 2006) [shudder!] That is remarkable. So glad I don't get to see OT. Just the statistics amaze me. And I thought I poste

Re: ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-01 Thread Ed Leafe
On Jul 1, 2006, at 7:03 AM, List Administrator Account wrote: Total [OT] Posts: 1983 (Up 135.51% relative to May, 2006) [shudder!] -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription

ProFox List Statistics for June, 2006

2006-07-01 Thread List Administrator Account
== ProFox List Statistics June, 2006 == Total Posts: 3588 (Up 26.56% relative to May, 2006) Total [OT] Posts: 1983 (Up 135.51% relative to May, 2006) Total [NF] Posts: 664 (Down 35.28% relative to May