On Oct 8, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
It sounds like Ed might need to implement the Sender Policy Framework:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
I've done that several times; it seems that Gmail occasionally changes what's
required. I'll look into it.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
I'll follow up later with some of their suggestions for reducing the
number of messages that they classify as spam.
Maybe Google just counted the number of messages maybe you
need to register Profox in her whitelists! :)
In
Interesting, I was just thinking that I haven't received one of these,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:45 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
On Oct 8, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
It sounds like Ed might need to implement the Sender Policy Framework:
Ed, here is a thought.
In my case, I use outlook or thunderbird to grab my email.
every once in awhile I go to gmail and delete the spam messages.
From time to time I notice some profox stuff in spam, but since I'm not
following the subject, I hit the delete all button to clear out the spam
On 10/10/2014 08:45 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
I'll follow up later with some of their suggestions for reducing the number of
messages that they classify as spam. In the meantime, feel free to re-activate
your account if you get automatically suspended for too many bounces.
Just so you know, when
On Oct 7, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Tracy Pearson tr...@powerchurch.com wrote:
It sounds like Ed might need to implement the Sender Policy Framework:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
I've done that several times; it seems that Gmail occasionally changes what's
required. I'll look
Ted Roche wrote on 2014-10-07:
Me, too: not only was I unsubscribed for too many bounces, GMail in its
infinite wisdom filed the notice in my spam folder, explaining that many
users had flagged the bounce message as spam.
Ted,
It sounds like Ed might need to implement the Sender Policy
7 matches
Mail list logo
