For vector graphics:
http://www.inkscape.org/
On 6/27/07, Mike Wohlrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks,
>
> This seems to be exactly what I was looking for. Once I get a better chance to
> look at it and use it, aside from the hour I got while on a plane ride from
> FLL
> to JFK, I will the
PROTECTED]
www.mikewohlrab.com
FTP://MikeWohlrab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Whil Hentzen (Pro*)
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 10:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Graphic editing/ creation software
> I am looking for s
Then we could have [OT SEX]
Mind you I prefer underneath as opposed to On Top!
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Newton
Sent: 25 June 2007 10:10
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Graphic editing/ creation software
Allen Pollard wrote:
> I quite liked [OT] myself, but it seemed to be too much based on American
> politics which seems to forget there are others from the rest of the world
> here not interested in that subject. If [OT] could steer clear of politics,
> war and religion I would have kept it.
> Alle
Alan Bourke wrote:
> Paul Newton wrote:
>
>> Then we could get rid of [OT] and just have {SEX] !
>>
>>
> You could have still have [OT] for sex, except it would mean 'on top'.
>
OK stop this NOW !
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_
Paul Newton wrote:
> Then we could get rid of [OT] and just have {SEX] !
>
You could have still have [OT] for sex, except it would mean 'on top'.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/prof
On Monday 25 June 2007 03:12, Allen Pollard wrote:
> I quite liked [OT] myself, but it seemed to be too much based on American
> politics which seems to forget there are others from the rest of the world
> here not interested in that subject. If [OT] could steer clear of politics,
> war and religio
Allen Pollard wrote:
> I quite liked [OT] myself, but it seemed to be too much based on American
> politics which seems to forget there are others from the rest of the world
> here not interested in that subject. If [OT] could steer clear of politics,
> war and religion I would have kept it.
> Alle
Allen Pollard wrote:
> So be it. :)
>
Then we could get rid of [OT] and just have {SEX] !
> Allen
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Alan Bourke
> Sent: 25 June 2007 10:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So be it. :)
Allen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 25 June 2007 10:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Graphic editing/ creation software
Allen Pollard wrote:
> I quite liked [OT] myself, but it seemed to be
Allen Pollard wrote:
> I quite liked [OT] myself, but it seemed to be too much based on American
> politics which seems to forget there are others from the rest of the world
> here not interested in that subject. If [OT] could steer clear of politics,
> war and religion I would have kept it.
That
I quite liked [OT] myself, but it seemed to be too much based on American
politics which seems to forget there are others from the rest of the world
here not interested in that subject. If [OT] could steer clear of politics,
war and religion I would have kept it.
Allen
-Original Message-
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Sunday 24 June 2007 12:25, MB Software Solutions wrote:
>
>> Pete Theisen wrote:
>>
>>> I should do some more, but I have had some health issues and my
>>> housekeeping is out of hand. When (if) I ever catch up with it . . .
>>>
>> ...and don't forget that yo
On Sunday 24 June 2007 12:25, MB Software Solutions wrote:
> Pete Theisen wrote:
> > I should do some more, but I have had some health issues and my
> > housekeeping is out of hand. When (if) I ever catch up with it . . .
>
> ...and don't forget that you participate in the [OT] too much. Cut that
The GIMP is great, and the price is right. However it is a very complex
and powerful piece of software, and since it's true home is the Linux
world, you may find the interface confusing if you're used to Windows apps.
I'd take a look at Paint.Net:
http://www.getpaint.net/index2.html
It's open
Pete Theisen wrote:
> I should do some more, but I have had some health issues and my housekeeping
> is out of hand. When (if) I ever catch up with it . . .
>
...and don't forget that you participate in the [OT] too much. Cut that
out and you'd be amazed at all the free time you have!
--
On 6/24/07, Mike Wohlrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> I am looking for some guidance as to if anyone knows of some good free graphic
> editing and creation software. On my website I have some images that link to
> other pages, but they have become blurred so I need to clean them up
On Saturday 23 June 2007 18:20, Mike Wohlrab wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> I am looking for some guidance as to if anyone knows of some good free
> graphic editing and creation software.
Hi Mike!
I did all the picture editing on my site in "The Gimp". I liked it.
I should do some more, but I have ha
> I am looking for some guidance as to if anyone knows of some good free graphic
> editing and creation software. On my website I have some images that link to
> other pages, but they have become blurred so I need to clean them up and make
> them look nicer. I also have some images that link to mor
The GIMP might be what you are looking for
http://www.gimp.org/windows/
On Sat, June 23, 2007 7:20 pm, Mike Wohlrab wrote:
> Hey all,
>
>
>
> I am looking for some guidance as to if anyone knows of some good free
> graphic
> editing and creation software. On my website I have some images that link
20 matches
Mail list logo