... more info at:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb250408(v=vs.85).aspx
my example used one of the IE built-in ('Default') behaviors - more on
these at:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/ms531081(v=vs.85).aspx
cheers (_)? (_)?
On 15/01/2013 22:56, MB Software Solu
DHTML - part of the bumpy evolution html>dhtml>web2>html5
ms behaviours appeared after most IE users started disabling activeX objects
('cos world and scripting dogs had discovered some version of:
filesystemobject Filesystemobject is New FileSystemObject() )
- like the other steps in the evo
Yeah Andy...what are you talking about???
On 1/15/2013 2:42 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
What's that?
On 15 January 2013 04:40, AndyHC wrote:
The old ms 'behaviours' use it (really!).
AndyD
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintena
Well, there's slightly hysterical warnings as usual. The vulnerability
lies with the Java browser plugins, or did until Oracle patched it.
Server-side Java, desktop java apps were not affected.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013, at 04:13 PM, James Harvey wrote:
> Been getting a number of "WARNINGS" about a new
What's that?
On 15 January 2013 04:40, AndyHC wrote:
> The old ms 'behaviours' use it (really!).
>
> AndyD
>
>
> On 14/01/2013 23:04, Paul Hill wrote:
>
>> Yes. Switch it off in the browser. Client side almost nothing uses it
>> these days anyway.
>>
>> On 14 January 2013 16:13, James Harvey
The old ms 'behaviours' use it (really!).
AndyD
On 14/01/2013 23:04, Paul Hill wrote:
Yes. Switch it off in the browser. Client side almost nothing uses it
these days anyway.
On 14 January 2013 16:13, James Harvey wrote:
Been getting a number of "WARNINGS" about a new security issue wit
On 1/14/2013 3:34 PM, Richard Kaye wrote:
The NoScript plug-in is also a good way to "opt out" of analytics or any 3rd
party JS.
+1
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software Architect
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
http://twitter.com/mbabcoc
The NoScript plug-in is also a good way to "opt out" of analytics or any 3rd
party JS.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:20 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Jav
12:35 PM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] Java Security issue
>
> Yes. Switch it off in the browser. Client side almost nothing uses it
> these days anyway.
>
> On 14 January 2013 16:13, James Harvey wrote:
>
> > Been getting a number of "WARNINGS&q
Yes, including removing software apple doesn't like.
Al
-Original Message-
So Apple can just come into anyone's computer and do stuff?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/pr
On 1/14/2013 1:40 PM, M Jarvis wrote:
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/u-s-agency-warns-of-java-software-problem/?ref=technology
from the article: "Apple stopped shipping its computers with Java
enabled last year, largely because of security concerns, but said it
was remotely disablin
One thing I noticed using firefox is that many web site call google stuff.
Is there a way to ban that without losing google search, maps etc
Al
-Original Message-
That's just the beginning. Here's some recommendations on safe browser
usage from your friends in the US gov't:
https://w
On 1/14/2013 11:13 AM, James Harvey wrote:
Been getting a number of "WARNINGS" about a new security issue with Java.
Not sure how concerned we should be? Should we turn Java off as they
recommend?
http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2013/01/12/us-government-advises-computer-users-to-disable-java-sof
>
> http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/u-s-agency-warns-of-java-software-problem/?ref=technology
>
from the article: "Apple stopped shipping its computers with Java
enabled last year, largely because of security concerns, but said it
was remotely disabling the Java 7 plug-in on Macs where it
Subject: Re: [NF] Java Security issue
That's just the beginning. Here's some recommendations on safe browser usage
from your friends in the US gov't:
https://www.us-cert.gov/reading_room/securing_browser/#Internet_Explorer
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Kurt wrote:
> I
--Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul
> Hill
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:35 PM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [NF] Java Security issue
>
> Yes. Switch it off in the browser. Client side almost no
-
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul
Hill
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:35 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] Java Security issue
Yes. Switch it off in the browser. Client side almost nothing uses it
these days anyway
Yes. Switch it off in the browser. Client side almost nothing uses it
these days anyway.
On 14 January 2013 16:13, James Harvey wrote:
> Been getting a number of "WARNINGS" about a new security issue with Java.
>
> Not sure how concerned we should be? Should we turn Java off as they
> recomme
18 matches
Mail list logo