Or you to understand basic hygiene.
--- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Madigan wrote:
> > You might have a chance at winning for a change.
> >
>
> Nooo, I would never win against a nose. That would
> be like asking you to
> understand irony.
>
> >
> > --- Ricardo Aráoz <[
Michael Madigan wrote:
> You might have a chance at winning for a change.
>
Nooo, I would never win against a nose. That would be like asking you to
understand irony.
>
> --- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Pete Theisen wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 21 February 2007 2:32 am, Adam
>> Bu
You might have a chance at winning for a change.
--- Ricardo Aráoz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pete Theisen wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 February 2007 2:32 am, Adam
> Buckland wrote:
> >
> > Hi Adam!
> >
> > Found it, thanks.
> >
> > It is too new for snopes to have anything on it. I
> smell a
Pete Theisen wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 February 2007 2:32 am, Adam Buckland wrote:
>
> Hi Adam!
>
> Found it, thanks.
>
> It is too new for snopes to have anything on it. I smell a fabrication here,
> however. Even if it is true, it would not have been a direct Bush decision to
> include or not
I hope you're not accusing our Anti-American friends
of mis-characterizing an event, are you?
--- "Michael Oke, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite a stretch. From what I read it appears that
> he was excluded
> because of what he intended to wear, not because he
> was an amputee.
>
> ::m
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 12:54 pm, Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Quite a stretch. From what I read it appears that he was excluded
> because of what he intended to wear, not because he was an amputee.
Hi Michael!
I remember when I was in the service I got to go anywhere I wanted to, you
just ha
Quite a stretch. From what I read it appears that he was excluded
because of what he intended to wear, not because he was an amputee.
::m
Ed Leafe wrote:
> Military amputee uninvited from Bush event because the press would
> see him with no legs
>
> http://americablog.blogspot.com/2007
On Feb 21, 2007, at 2:32 AM, Adam Buckland wrote:
> Try : http://tinyurl.com/35lamb
>
> It looses the - at the end of the line when it splits.
Oh my goodness! Here I am complaining about amputees forcing us to
see the results of our trite sayings, and I end up displaying an
amputated
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 2:32 am, Adam Buckland wrote:
Hi Adam!
Found it, thanks.
It is too new for snopes to have anything on it. I smell a fabrication here,
however. Even if it is true, it would not have been a direct Bush decision to
include or not include a person on a guest list, for
Try : http://tinyurl.com/35lamb
It looses the - at the end of the line when it splits.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Theisen
Sent: 21 February 2007 05:07
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: [OT] All that unpleasantness!
On
On Tuesday 20 February 2007 8:56 pm, Ed Leafe wrote:
> Military amputee uninvited from Bush event because the press would
> see him with no legs
>
> http://americablog.blogspot.com/2007/02/military-amputee-uninvited-
> from-bush.html
Hi Ed!
Getting a "Not Found" error. Guess he isn't there.
11 matches
Mail list logo