Helio W. wrote:
So why not bomb and invade Saudi Arabia, then?
Hi Helio!
That is a good idea, but they need an excuse, like Saddam Hussein, for
example.
Regards,
Pete
On 7/20/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I've never said, ever, ever, never, said that Iraq
was
So why not bomb and invade Saudi Arabia, then?
On 7/20/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I've never said, ever, ever, never, said that Iraq
was involved in 911. Stop lying.
I said Iraq was supporting Hammas and had links to Al
Qaeda. They were giving 25,000 to the family of
Helio W. wrote:
So why not bomb and invade Saudi Arabia, then?
Duh. That’s were the oil friendships lie. Been that way for 3 Bush
generations, and if the twins play the game properly it could continue to a
fourth.
Stephen Russell
DBA / Operations Developer
Memphis TN 38115
901.246-0159
Oh yeah, the Bin Laden family connection.
On 7/21/06, Stephen the Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Helio W. wrote:
So why not bomb and invade Saudi Arabia, then?
Duh. That's were the oil friendships lie. Been that way for 3 Bush
generations, and if the twins play the game properly it could
It is all too easy for politician's to lose sight of the fact that
behind all their military decision making, are fathers, husbands, wives,
sons and so on. I think this brings home the message that behind those
words of collateral damage (surely one of the most offensive phrases
ever devised) are
What about the fathers, husbands, wives and sons that
died on 911? This jackoff movie maker forgets that.
--- Dominic Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is all too easy for politician's to lose sight of
the fact that
behind all their military decision making, are
fathers, husbands, wives,
The maker of this film is not making *any* statement about 911 that I
can see. He is only making a point about the troops who are currently
serving in Iraq. If you see more than that, then you have added it
yourself.
Regards
Dominic Burford BSc Hons MBCS CITP
Third Party Developer Program
His point is that we shouldn't be there, but he
conveniently leaves out 911.
--- Dominic Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The maker of this film is not making *any* statement
about 911 that I
can see. He is only making a point about the troops
who are currently
serving in Iraq. If you see
On 7/20/06, Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 5:51 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
Tactic sure sounds familiar
So do the responses...
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
Oh, i was in fact referring to some of the 'retarded' responses.
but by
Michael Madigan wrote:
What about the fathers, husbands, wives and sons that died on 911?
This jackoff movie maker forgets that.
I think they showed equal respect for that event. And why are you still
confused with 9-11 and Iraq still? I didn't think you were that dense,
maybe I'm
Yeah and I guess Hezbolah and Hammas have no contacts
to each other either.
--- Stephen the Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Michael Madigan wrote:
What about the fathers, husbands, wives and sons
that died on 911?
This jackoff movie maker forgets that.
I think they showed equal
And you conveniently believe that Iraq was involved in the 911.
Hey, wait... wasn't WMDs the reason of the invasion?
On 7/20/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
His point is that we shouldn't be there, but he
conveniently leaves out 911.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME
No, I've never said, ever, ever, never, said that Iraq
was involved in 911. Stop lying.
I said Iraq was supporting Hammas and had links to Al
Qaeda. They were giving 25,000 to the family of each
Hammas suicide bomber. I also said they were
stockpiling WMD which they could give to a terrorist.
Retardation takes brain damage
--- Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.peacetakescourage.com/number.html
Stephen Russell
DBA / Developer
Electracash, Inc.
5100 Poplar Ave.
Suite 2518
Memphis, Tennessee 38137
1-901-684-0348
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Retardation takes brain damage
Calling our fighting men and women retards? That is so Republican
American of you. Knowing that they do your dirty work and you cheer
them on.
___
Post Messages to:
Actually I was calling the maker of the film a retard,
as you well know.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Retardation takes brain damage
Calling our fighting men and women retards? That is
so Republican
American of you. Knowing that they do your
From: Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually I was calling the maker of the film a retard,
as you well know.
Paying honor to those poor retards who died? That makes sense. Or did
you like the images of the kids who lost their fathers better?
On 7/19/06, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually I was calling the maker of the film a retard,
as you well know.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Retardation takes brain damage
Calling our fighting men and women retards? That is
so
No, the blaming of the Bush and Cheney.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Actually I was calling the maker of the film a
retard,
as you well know.
Paying honor to those poor retards who died? That
makes sense. Or did
you like the images of the
On Jul 19, 2006, at 5:51 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote:
Tactic sure sounds familiar
So do the responses...
-- Ed Leafe
-- http://leafe.com
-- http://dabodev.com
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance:
20 matches
Mail list logo