RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-07 Thread Philip Borkholder
Thank you Dave, We did shut off all the power saving features of the NIOC. I'll try these other settings. Philip -- Original Message -- From: Dave Crozier To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 08:

RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-07 Thread Dave Crozier
l such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time -Original Message- From: ProFox On Behalf Of Philip Borkholder Sent: 06 July 2020 18:30 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Thank you

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-06 Thread Philip Borkholder
p > > -- Original Message ------ > From: "Alan Bourke" > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors > Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:44:36 +0100 > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 4:11 PM, Philip Borkho

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-06 Thread Philip Borkholder
LAN speed? Thanks, Philip -- Original Message -- From: Ted Roche To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2020 15:07:17 -0400 Phil: 1. Can you confirm the local machine's network is actually running at f

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-03 Thread Ted Roche
n speed. Anyone have any other advice? > Thanks,Philip > -- Original Message -- > From: "Philip Borkholder" > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors > Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:24:16 GMT > > Follow

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-03 Thread Alan Bourke
> From: "Alan Bourke" > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors > Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:44:36 +0100 > > On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 4:11 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: > > > I set the LanManWorkstation >

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
o: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 17:24:16 GMT Followup question Alan,When you stopped setting these to zero because Win 10 was "fixed" How did you leave the File Server LanManServer settings for :SMB1SMB2SMB3

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
Server has not shut off SMB2 or 3 My understanding was that the 3 Registry settings I listed were set to zero then to compensate for not shutting of SMB2 & 3 Thanks,Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Alan Bourke" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 20

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
Thanks Alan,I thought we had to always have them set for Windows 10.I'll try that.-Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Alan Bourke" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:44:36 +0100

Re: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Alan Bourke
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, at 4:11 PM, Philip Borkholder wrote: > I set the LanManWorkstation > settings for to avoid CDX > corruption:[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\LanmanWorkstation\Parameters] > FileInfoCacheLifetime = > 0FileNotFoundCacheLifetime=0DirectoryCacheLifetime=0

RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Philip Borkholder
Thank you Tracy,I'll review that with my customer. Philip -- Original Message -- From: "Tracy Pearson" To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 11:47:42 -0400 What I have seen is a co

RE: DBFs Server 2012 R2 very slow with Certain Processors

2020-07-02 Thread Tracy Pearson
What I have seen is a couple of network bottleneck issues. 1) The VFP exe should be on the local machine and accessing the data on the network. This removes a security layer and a network layer that happens when a section of the binary needs to be read. My VFP exe is over 20 MB. 2) The network ca