RE: Problem running PRG from vRunFox(9)

2009-10-07 Thread Richard Kaye
profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 6:08 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Problem running PRG from vRunFox(9) I just thought it would compile the PRG on the fly, but I guess it's

Re: Problem running PRG from vRunFox(9)

2009-10-07 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Richard Kaye wrote: >>> Hmmmwonder if it would work on the FXP file instead? Gotta try that. > It should. I do this all the time when I need to run some ad hoc code from my > app's backdoor. Edit, compile, run til I get it right. I just thought it would compile the PRG on the fly, but I gue

RE: Problem running PRG from vRunFox(9)

2009-10-07 Thread Richard Kaye
esday, October 07, 2009 5:30 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: Problem running PRG from vRunFox(9) Richard Kaye wrote: > Did you compile? This won't happen magically in a runtime environment. Having > said that, I believe that's one of the main reasons EXECSCRIPT was added.

Re: Problem running PRG from vRunFox(9)

2009-10-07 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Richard Kaye wrote: > Did you compile? This won't happen magically in a runtime environment. Having > said that, I believe that's one of the main reasons EXECSCRIPT was added. Hmmmwonder if it would work on the FXP file instead? Gotta try that. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions,

RE: Problem running PRG from vRunFox(9)

2009-10-07 Thread Richard Kaye
Did you compile? This won't happen magically in a runtime environment. Having said that, I believe that's one of the main reasons EXECSCRIPT was added. rk -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software Solutions, LLC