Ed said:
"Choices are a drawback? Didn't you say they were a benefit? Yes, it
can be both. It can be hard to pick the right open source software to
best fit your needs."
I'd love to see this guy in a supermarket. He must spend hours in
the cereal aisle worrying that he might not pick the
On Oct 24, 2007, at 7:43 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder, EdI remembered after reading this that I
> didn't take my daily vitaminin that case, I absolutely love a
> one-pill Centrum that gives me all the things my body needs for that
> day, as I'm not disciplined
Ed Leafe wrote:
> I'd love to see this guy in a supermarket. He must spend hours in
> the cereal aisle worrying that he might not pick the absolute best
> kind of cereal for his needs. And what about all those fruits and
> vegetables? Ah! I'd just rather swallow a pill supplied
Alan Bourke wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:43:25 -0400, "Ted Roche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Aspect-Oriented Programming
>
> (checks Wikipedia)
>
> That looks even more confusing than functional programming.
My programs have a uniformly bad Aspect. Is that ok?
___
Ted Roche wrote:
> On 10/24/07, Mike yearwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> There is also "too much of a good thing" and "the kid in the candy
>> store". There's no standardization with the confusion of all these
>> choices. That alone is costing businesses plenty. Not too mention
>> retooling e
Mike yearwood wrote:
> Hi Ted
>
>> Message: 8
>> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:48:56 -0400
>> From: "Ted Roche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Re: [NF] Open source or proprietary: Which software model is
>>better for the consumer?
>&
MB Software Solutions wrote:
> http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=117&tag=nl.e101
>
Loved the concept "Proprietary software is based on the communist style
of one-size-fits all rather than the capitalist free market."
___
Post Messages t
On 10/24/07, Alan Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That looks even more confusing than functional programming.
>
Yeah, we used to think that OOP was hard to understand, too.
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
Po
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:43:25 -0400, "Ted Roche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Aspect-Oriented Programming
(checks Wikipedia)
That looks even more confusing than functional programming.
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Post Messages to: ProFo
On 10/24/07, Mike yearwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is also "too much of a good thing" and "the kid in the candy
> store". There's no standardization with the confusion of all these
> choices. That alone is costing businesses plenty. Not too mention
> retooling every few years.
>
> Mik
Hi Ted
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:48:56 -0400
> From: "Ted Roche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [NF] Open source or proprietary: Which software model is
> better for the consumer?
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Message-ID:
>
Man-wai Chang wrote:
> MB Software Solutions wrote:
>> http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=117&tag=nl.e101
>>
>
> Two faces of the same coin :)
>
... war for independence again... LOL...
--
@~@http://changmw.homeip.net
/ v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.
MB Software Solutions wrote:
> http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=117&tag=nl.e101
>
Two faces of the same coin :)
--
@~@http://changmw.homeip.net
/ v \ May the Force and Farce be with you! Linux 2.6.23.1
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) 21:06:01 up 10 days 23:32
^ ^2 use
On 10/24/07, MB Software Solutions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=117&tag=nl.e101
"Stripes or plaid: which is the right choice?"
I am so tired of these stupid arguments that just set up an artificial
either-or situation.
"GPL or LPGL?" "Debian vs. Ev
On Oct 24, 2007, at 8:34 AM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
> http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/opensource/?p=117&tag=nl.e101
From the article:
"Choices are a drawback? Didn’t you say they were a benefit? Yes, it
can be both. It can be hard to pick the right open source software to
bes
15 matches
Mail list logo