Re: Record width

On Nov 4, 2020, at 14:22, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote: > > And this project is one of those passed through the years and isn't something > easily refactored without worries you break something elsewhere unknown. s/worries/guaranteeing Fixed that for you. -- Ed Leafe

Re: Record width

And this project is one of those passed through the years and isn't something easily refactored without worries you break something elsewhere unknown. On 11/3/2020 1:41 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: I hope you are the winner. On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 6:25 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwar

Re: Record width

I hope you are the winner. On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 6:25 PM MB Software Solutions, LLC < mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote: > I've got a client who's main data table for their orders is over 2300 > wide for record length. > > Anybody seen any wider in their travels? > > > > -- > Th

Re: Record width

I have seen SQL Server tables with 20+ fields of varchar 4000. Total lack of discipline and perfect example of laziness that is infecting the software world's concept of "data." Needless to say, the shoddy approach of that application also showed through into the UI and other areas. In terms o

Record width

I've got a client who's main data table for their orders is over 2300 wide for record length. Anybody seen any wider in their travels? -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ Post