Paul McNett wrote:
Charlie Coleman wrote:
The only downside is if you need to update the OCX itself - e.g. going
to a
later version of the OCX. In that case, they'd have to do the big
install
again.
I'm glad I took the position of never relying on too many third-party
libraries. The
only
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Charlie Coleman colem...@acm.org wrote:
ROFL. Where have you been? The viruses are all still around, popping in
through IE use, MS Outlook emails, Windows security holes, blah blah blah.
Maybe the problem is we've just never GOT OUT OF the 90's with Windows.
Stephen Russell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Charlie Coleman colem...@acm.org wrote:
ROFL. Where have you been? The viruses are all still around, popping in
through IE use, MS Outlook emails, Windows security holes, blah blah blah.
Maybe the problem is we've just never GOT OUT OF
Charlie Coleman wrote:
At 09:15 PM 1/31/2009 -0600, Stephen Russell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, KAM.covad
a_gmail_nos...@kenmcginnis.com wrote:
Installing on the local machine will not work for my clients. I have
tried it. It is a mess. If you have 8 workstations, you would have
[MB wrote:]
Rick Borup's session on installers at WhilFest years ago
suggested this, iirc. (Well, not exactly a BIG app but
rather a lightweight one that had all the runtimes.) He'd
deploy something like a notebook/notepad/calendar app that
was basic but contained the runtimes, and then
Charlie Coleman wrote:
The only downside is if you need to update the OCX itself - e.g. going to a
later version of the OCX. In that case, they'd have to do the big install
again.
I'm glad I took the position of never relying on too many third-party
libraries. The
only OCX I ever relied on
At 09:15 PM 1/31/2009 -0600, Stephen Russell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, KAM.covad
a_gmail_nos...@kenmcginnis.com wrote:
Installing on the local machine will not work for my clients. I have
tried it. It is a mess. If you have 8 workstations, you would have to
update all 8 at the
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:21 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
Stephen Russell wrote:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Charlie Coleman colem...@acm.org wrote:
ROFL. Where have you been? The viruses are all still around, popping in
Installing on the local machine will not work for my clients. I have tried it.
It is a mess. If you have 8 workstations, you would have to update all 8 at the
same time. You would have to deal with that stupid MS requirement to 'register'
ocx and dll files, even if they are in the same folder
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:01 PM, KAM.covad
a_gmail_nos...@kenmcginnis.com wrote:
Installing on the local machine will not work for my clients. I have tried
it. It is a mess. If you have 8 workstations, you would have to update all 8
at the same time. You would have to deal with that stupid MS
10 matches
Mail list logo
