Re: field storage on an object

2006-07-06 Thread Michael Hawksworth
My base business object can link to one or more (or none for some functions such as the global variable store) dataobjects, the system allows automatic step through of these mostly as a function of the dataobject with or without a filter applied to the bo. More complex structures require codin

Re: field storage on an object

2006-07-05 Thread Ken Dibble
Might I suggest a slight variation? An invoice demonstrates a need to deal with sets of records - the line items. There may even be several parent records each with their own children that have to be committed. Agreed. Business objects modeling anything other than the simplest objects will of

Re: field storage on an object

2006-07-05 Thread Ted Roche
On 7/5/06, Mike yearwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Might I suggest a slight variation? An invoice demonstrates a need to deal with sets of records - the line items. There may even be several parent records each with their own children that have to be committed. Agreed. Business objects model

Re: field storage on an object

2006-07-05 Thread Mike yearwood
Hi Michael Message: 1 Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 09:42:06 +0100 From: Michael Hawksworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: field storage on an object To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed As it requires your f

Re: field storage on an object

2006-07-05 Thread Ted Roche
On 7/4/06, Tristan Leask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Here is a question to anyone but the states (as they are on hols 4th July and all that). Holidays are just days when the clients are less likely to call and keep you from getting any work done . What is your preferred method of storage for

RE: field storage on an object

2006-07-04 Thread Dave Crozier
Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Hawksworth Posted At: 04 July 2006 09:16 Posted To: Profox Archive Conversation: field storage on an object Subject: Re: field storage on an object Later way may be lazy but it is the way I do it ;) Each

RE: field storage on an object

2006-07-04 Thread Dave Crozier
s are smart people with the ability to do incredibly stupid things. They are, in short, a perfect match" - Bill Bryson -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tristan Leask Sent: 04 July 2006 08:59 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: field sto

Re: field storage on an object

2006-07-04 Thread Michael Hawksworth
As it requires your form to 'know' what the data structure is you degrade the abstraction but between you and me, I do it for maintenance forms as I can then automate most functions. I doubt many would care about the abstraction at the form level saying that the business object is presenti

RE: field storage on an object

2006-07-04 Thread Tristan Leask
: field storage on an object Subject: Re: field storage on an object Later way may be lazy but it is the way I do it ;) Each business object has oCurrentObject and oTemplate that are derived from the table that are accessed by other methods within the bo (GetAddress etc.). As these are public I can

Re: field storage on an object

2006-07-04 Thread Michael Hawksworth
Later way may be lazy but it is the way I do it ;) Each business object has oCurrentObject and oTemplate that are derived from the table that are accessed by other methods within the bo (GetAddress etc.). As these are public I can (if I'm cutting corners use them directly lboOrganisation.oCur

field storage on an object

2006-07-04 Thread Tristan Leask
Morning all, Here is a question to anyone but the states (as they are on hols 4th July and all that). What is your preferred method of storage for fields on a biz object? Create a property for each field on the object and load them in individually or create 1 property and then scatter the fields