As usual I was going to do the upgrade on everything.
I clicked on upgradeable and was going to click on check all but missed the
button and clicked on upgrade selected but none was selected.
It did upgrade everything anyway because it knew my intention.
This is AI for dummies.
2012/11/16 Eric
On 17 November 2012 02:39, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Alex Giannakopoulos
> > then cheap tricks like "padding" to read will have to be discarded,
> > and something more serious adopted. (I mean, you're not going to
> > pad a 3-d cube with 6 copies of itself, are you?
If you are talking about my post on the 10th, where I proposed
arcn=:3 :0
'D c1 X'=: y
X1=. 1=X
([:+./"1[: +./((|:c1) *"1 2~ (|:X1) *"1 2 ]) +. c1 *"1 2~ X1 *"1 2 ])^:_ D
)
... note that it works just fine when D is not square.
And all I got out of Mike's 11/11 message was that D might not
Boss is Boss, I eventually arrived at the same (non-negative case) solution.
Thanks km for the explanation of @ vs @: which I'm starting to slowly get.
Linda: I think I prefer having it on three lines. It better breaks down
the steps I'm trying to accomplish. Maybe someday I'll be able to boil
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Alex Giannakopoulos
> Of course, by the time we get to 3-D
tic-tac-toe on a torus, then cheap
> tricks like "padding" to read will have to be discarded, and something more
> serious adopted. (I mean, you're not going to pad a 3-d cube with 6 copies
> of itself, a
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Peter B. Kessler
wrote:
> What I can't give you is a feeling for how Raul Miller came up with this
> particular way of producing that result.
I am not used to seeing my name repeated so many times, I am not sure
how to deal with that.
That said, I do happen to kn
I have always compared @ and @: to pipe. In UNIX pipe linked each item to
be passed from one function to the next. Where in DOS the pipe created a
file of all items using the first function, then passed the file it to the
next function.
To me the difference gives the dependence between items. @ sa
Raul Miller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Alex Giannakopoulos
Nice "torus-pad" ([:|:{:,]{.)^:2
Or, more generally:
(0 |:{:,],{.)^:(#@$)
Also, here's a general "fill pad":
((_1 ["0 $) |. ({.~ 2 +$))
That said: generality can be good for insight, and in utility
contexts, but
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Alexander Mikhailov wrote:
>> Note that Context Free Grammars tend to be ambiguous, in traditional
>> programming environments we typically want a Parsing Expression
>> Grammar. And we probably need "cloud sized resources" to adequately
>> tackle natural language
(Correct the title)
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 16, 2012, at 3:38 PM, km wrote:
> Here is my attempt to explain the difference between conjunctions @: and @
>
> ]A =: 2 3 $ 1 2 3 4 5 6
> 1 2 3
> 4 5 6
> |. A NB. Reverse matrix A
> 4 5 6
> 1 2 3
> |."1 A NB. Reverse each row of A (each 1
Here is my attempt to explain the difference between conjunctions @: and @
]A =: 2 3 $ 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 2 3
4 5 6
|. A NB. Reverse matrix A
4 5 6
1 2 3
|."1 A NB. Reverse each row of A (each 1-cell)
3 2 1
6 5 4
|. @: (|."1) A NB. Reverse the result of |."1 A
6 5 4
3 2 1
|. @ (|."1
Brian Schott wrote:
> Now I want to know if any gmail users know how to use the keyboard and
> not the mouse to delete a message, not a conversation. I used to be
I don't see how to delete a message, but I have part of the puzzle --
"p/n" work to highlight a specific message; if the one you want
You might find useful the kind of integer index tree I'd mentioned in the
earlier discussion: it's a vector of integers where each element is the
index of the parent node but with _1 for the root's parent. I use this for
modeling directory trees and it works well for that. Also, what I'm
usually
I was not aware of the '?'. That is great.
Now I want to know if any gmail users know how to use the keyboard and
not the mouse to delete a message, not a conversation. I used to be
able to use the keyboard to click on the down-arrow button which is
now on the top of the conversation panel, and th
The most important keyboard stroke to remember though is `?` - as it
gives all the strokes, lightening the memory load!
On the subject of the `style` of the forum though, i would have to say
follow Raul: Not only is he very useful, and prolific, but he
accurately reflects the mainstream of this gr
Click the "Gear" icon in the upper right corner of the Gmail page in your
browser. Click "Settings", and the "General" tab. then look for "Keyboard
Shortcuts" and set "keyboard shortcuts on".
Warning: there are LOTS of keyboard shortcuts. Click on the "Learn More"
link to see them all.
Skip
On F
Click on the "gear" icon on the right side of the page near the top.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Linda Alvord wrote:
> Where do you find keyboard settings?
>
> Linda
>
--
(B=)
--
For information about J forums see http://ww
Where do you find keyboard settings?
Linda
-Original Message-
From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Skip Cave
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 12:19 PM
To: programm...@jsoftware.com
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Thanks
> Note that Context Free Grammars tend to be ambiguous, in traditional
> programming environments we typically want a Parsing Expression
> Grammar. And we probably need "cloud sized resources" to adequately
> tackle natural language parsing.
I have only little familiarity with PEGs; I'm not sure
Actually Brian did more than type 'r' (or hit the 'reply' button wo
keystrokes) - he edited out part of Vijays message. How this is done
affects all those attempting to archive the stream, and hence is of
more than passing concern.
greg
~krsnadas.org
--
from:Skip Cave s...@caveconsulting.co
The "General" forum is probably the best place to discuss the difficulty of
finding information on the J software site. I will post my comments there
under the topic "difficulty of finding information on the J software site"
Skip
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Alex Giannakopoulos <
aeg...@blue
The "r" for reply only works if you have turned on the "keyboard shortcuts"
in your Gmail settings.
Skip
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Brian Schott wrote:
> Vijay,
>
> I use gmail (too) and I just press the "r" key to reply.
>
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Vijay Lulla wrote:
> > On a s
Oh, yes!
Typing it into the the main page search box is not much better either.
Is there a thread where this is being discussed, so I don't clutter the
space here?
There is some real irrelevant stuff in the Wiki FAQs too, which could
desperately use a tidying.
I mean, using x. and y. ? Seriousl
Thanks for that.
Once I've got this lot well under my belt, I *will* be generalizing to 3-D,
of course.
I think a Conway's Life-3D, or 3-d tic-tac-toe will be good examples for J.
Of course, by the time we get to 3-D tic-tac-toe on a torus, then cheap
tricks like "padding" to read will have to be
Vijay,
I use gmail (too) and I just press the "r" key to reply.
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Vijay Lulla wrote:
> On a side note, how do I reply to a specific message. I've never
> participated in a mailing list before.
> Once again, thanks for great answers.
> Vijay.
--
(B=) <-my sig
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Alex Giannakopoulos
> Nice "torus-pad" ([:|:{:,]{.)^:2
Or, more generally:
(0 |:{:,],{.)^:(#@$)
Also, here's a general "fill pad":
((_1 ["0 $) |. ({.~ 2 +$))
That said: generality can be good for insight, and in utility
contexts, but can also sometimes b
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Alexander Mikhailov wrote:
> http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/AlexMikhailov/Parsing
>
> There are multiple questions regarding J style. For example, it seems like it
> would be awfully inefficient to try to solve parsing problem in parallel -
> avoiding the loop. O
If you want to get really confused, try typing "FAQ" in the wiki search box.
Skip
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Alex Giannakopoulos <
aeg...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> Wow, you mean there *is* actually a FAQ?
>
> Why does the link not appear on the Jsoftware home page?
> Hold on, maybe it's u
I suppose the simplest explanation is that defining fact =: */ >: i. in effect
puts parentheses around */ >: i. and
(*/ >: i.) 5
is different from
*/ >: i. 5
As others have explained, the first of these is interpreted as
(*/ 5) >: (i. 5)
and the second as
*/ (>: (i. 5))
You could
Wow, you mean there *is* actually a FAQ?
Why does the link not appear on the Jsoftware home page?
Hold on, maybe it's under "Help" Ooops, not here either.
Maybe under "Getting Started"?... No, not, here.
Perhaps the "Getting started Wiki"? Nope.
Ah, here it is, top page of "Guides". Well,
I venture to say that q2 would concern the difference between @: and @
On 16 November 2012 10:22, Alex Giannakopoulos wrote:
> If we made a FAQ, this would probably be q1
>
>
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jso
Hm, this must be *the* newbie question, it was the first one I asked, too!
For better or for worse, J has the concept of trains (hooks and forks)
which - while simplifying some tasks - cause a disparity between "inline"
code interpreted as a one-liner and code made up of functions.
The problem, i
Alexander,
Many thanks for producing this. I am very glad to see it
and I will study it carefully.
Regards
- Original Message -
From: "Alexander Mikhailov"
To:
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2012 1:21 AM
Subject: [Jprogramming] parsing with J, cont.
Regarding
http://www.jsoftwar
Because the language is so rich with powerful verbs, you will often work
hard to achieve a result as you did here. Later you learn that it is an
important enough that it already exists in J and is ready to use like
factorial.
!5
120
Don't let this bother you. As you learn to define ideas yo
34 matches
Mail list logo
