Correct Linda. That is a bug in the translation from BASIC to J.
- Bo
>
> Fra: Linda Alvord
>Til: programm...@jsoftware.com
>Sendt: 1:54 fredag den 30. november 2012
>Emne: Re: [Jprogramming] Translating BASIC into J
>
>J701 with Vista agree on the results f
I finally wrote f without @
]A=:?3 3$3
0 0 2
0 0 0
0 2 1
f=: 13 :'(0mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Linda Alvord
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 1:56 PM
To: programm...@jsoftware.com
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Arc consistency in J
Mike, I changed f a
I agree that all this needs more and *clear* and *visible* explanation!
It was the first question I asked, and in the two+ years (on-and-off) that
I have been mucking around with J I have seen asked on this forum umpteen
times.
I have also seen it debated at length (and breadth and depth). By
expe
J701 with Vista agree on the results for 0 and 00
pray 0
CREDO CONFITEOR ET EXPECTO AMEN
pray 00
CREDO CONFITEOR ET EXPECTO AMEN
Linda
-Original Message-
From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Bo Jacoby
S
I apologize for the slow response -- I have not been dealing with
email much last week or this week.
Anyways, here's an untested translation to J:
credo=:3 :0
A=. <;._2]1!:1 <'CREDO'
Apat=. ( [: ({.~ * i. _1:) _48 + 3 u: ])&> A
Atxt=. (' ', ] (}.~ * i. _1:) _48 + 3 u: ])&> A
while. 0
Isn't the issue related to /
(+:@+)/ 3 4 5
42
(+:@:+)/ 3 4 5
42
([:+:+)/ 3 4 5
42
All the promises about @ and @: and [: seem to do as promised. Where you
put the / is what matters.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
[mailt
Ian,
The link http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Ordinal-fraction
contains my deleted wikipedia article. I wonder how it ended there!
I am not familiar with Frege's Begriffschrift.
On this link
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Mathematics/2010_July
That's it!
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Dan Bron wrote:
> Use nl from the standard library.
>
>'bs*' nl noun
> +-+--+
> |bsome|bsome2|
> +-+--+
>'bs*' nl verb
> +---+
> |subsets|
> +---+
>
I can't disagree with your contention about how people (try to) approach J or
other programming languages.
For my part, when I started J, I found the DoJ impenetrable and eschewed it for
the first year or two of my career. I learned J through the collective wisdom
and generosity of these For
> What provoked your doubt?
In learning J, I've stumbled from one false assumption to another.
Mainly about verb composition. Were I to be the only person to
experience this, it could be put down to a weak intellect. But if my
experience is not uncommon, it points to a need for J documentation to
Use nl from the standard library.
'bs*' nl noun
+-+--+
|bsome|bsome2|
+-+--+
'bs*' nl verb
+---+
|subsets|
+---+
'bs*' nl noun,verb
+-+--+---+
|bsome|bsome2|subsets|
Have you used either Find or Find in Files… under the Edit menu? If you want to
use wild cards such as * this becomes a little more difficult since they could
be a valid part of the string.
Hope this helps.
Cheers, bob
On 2012-11-29, at 11:54 AM, Y-01 wrote:
> New questions about documentatio
New questions about documentation-releated things)
How can we find all defined symbols by pattern?
*example:
A1=: i.10
bsome =: 2
bsome2 =: bsome + A1
find 'bs*'
bsome
bsome2
so, we need smth like 'find'.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Zachary Elliott wrote:
> a few quic
Bo,
Is this a numerical encoding of (say) Frege's Begriffschrift? That's
what it looks like to me, from your all-too-brief description. You'll
need to write it up somewhere, because nobody can experiment with it
for themselves otherwise. Should I be looking at your Göteborg paper?
How about airin
Here is a comment from Chapter 40 of J for C Programmers:
The verb [:, which we met as a way to cause an error, has a special meaning in
a fork. As the leftmost verb of the fork, [: means 'ignore the left branch'.
So, Nx ([: V1 V2) Ny is V1 Nx V2 Ny and ([: V1 V2) Ny is V1 V2 Ny . In both
ca
Right. For this reason (or similar ones, like when g is a train), I phrase
the identity as ([: f g) ↔ f@:(g) .
As to where this is stated: well, it's recorded informally in innumerable
documents and J learning materials. If you're looking for formal
guarantees in canonical material (the DoJ),
Thanks Dan.
What I'm hearing reassures me.
I'm in the final testing phase of an explication utility. It assumes
the production: ([: f g) ==> f@:(g) . I just had a panic attack
and wondered if (and whereabouts) this was guaranteed.
IanClark
Thanks for alerting me to this possibility, Bob.
Fortunately it seems, in the situation it's arising in, I can be
confident the tacit code coming to my utility is fully-parenthesised.
Or at least, appropriately parenthesised.
Viz (+:@:+)/ as opposed to: +:@:(+/)
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:00 PM,
Ian,
Note that pray '0' and pray '00' is not the same thing.
0: CREDO CONFITEOR ET EXPECTO AMEN
00: CREDO IN DEUM ET IN JESUM ET IN SPIRITUM ET ECCLESIAM CONFITEOR BAPTISMA ET
EXPECTO RESURRECTIONEM ET VITAM AMEN
The linenumbers in the database may be padded to the right with zeroes, but not
t
Right. For this reason (or similar ones, like when g is a train), I
usually say the identity is ([: f g) <==> f@:(g) .
As to where this is stated: well, it's recorded informally in innumerable
documents and J learning materials. If you're looking for formal
guarantees in canonical material (t
Yup, that's my Bible for it too.
It's the sort of fact you have to know before you can look it up.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:18 PM, km wrote:
> Oh Ye Of Little Faith,
>
> The only sources I know are the Vocabulary entries for Atop @ and At @: plus
> the Dictionary reference for Trains. In part
Oh Ye Of Little Faith,
The only sources I know are the Vocabulary entries for Atop @ and At @: plus
the Dictionary reference for Trains. In particular the comment in the latter
that the ranks of fork and hook are infinite.
Kip Murray
Sent from my iPad
On Nov 29, 2012, at 10:49 AM, Ian Clark
Thinking it through, I guess that this example is really (v a) where v is
+:@:+, and the a is / , although it might look like u is +: and v is + to my
(untrained) human eye.
Cheers, bob
On 2012-11-29, at 9:00 AM, bob therriault wrote:
> HI Ian,
>
> If your v includes an adverb such as / the
HI Ian,
If your v includes an adverb such as / the long left reach of conjunctions
could get you into trouble. That would be part of the parsing rules for verbs
vs conjunctions.
(+:@:+/) 3 4 5
42
([:+:+/) 3 4 5
24
Cheers, bob
On 2012-11-29, at 8:49 AM, Ian Clark wrote:
> Department of Sud
clear''
...oops, that was a swab left in the patient!
Your coclass suggestion is exactly what I'd do if releasing the code
as a utility in JAL. And I'd make the (go) method public by having
this sentence in the script:
go_z_=: go_credo_
It ruins a nice snappy name like 'go' to have to write
Hi Mini,
מינה היי, חשבתי שאתה רוצה באתר זה. מעולם לא ראיתי אותו לפני אמצע הלילה אתמול
בלילה! Wierd צירוף מקרים. לינדה
In case this is not clear, try
http://translate.google.com/#auto/en/%E3%83%9E%E3%82%B8%E3%81%A9%E3%81%
86%E3%82%82%E3%81%82%E3%82%8A%E3%81%8C%E3%81%A8%E3%81%94%E3%81%96%E3%81%
8
Bo,
I am so sorry for slagging off your program!
Had I known it was yours, I wouldn't have written what I did. I
assumed this was an educational curio you came across (as I often used
to do in hobby magazines) and hadn't quite known how it worked --
because you had claimed you didn't know how to
Good fun. Ian I'd suggest changing the preamble of your script to
coclass 'credo'
CREDO=: (<;._2) 0 : 0
1 CREDO
11 IN
111 UNUM
...
that clear'' cleans one's base - then credo starts with
go_credo_ ''
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Bo Jacoby wrote:
> Ian, you did an amazing job! Thank yo
Ian, you did an amazing job! Thank you very much!
You write about my BASIC program: "Like many amateur programs, it thoroughly
mixes up input, processing and output. Even in the 1960s when BASIC was
invented (Kemeny & Kurtz,
1964) this was recognised to be a bad thing". Yes, everybody knew how
He might enjoy some of these thoughts once he finishes his code.
*@:(-/~)i._5
0 1 1 1 1
_1 0 1 1 1
_1 _1 0 1 1
_1 _1 _1 0 1
_1 _1 _1 _1 0
|:*-/~ i.5
0 1 1 1 1
_1 0 1 1 1
_1 _1 0 1 1
_1 _1 _1 0 1
_1 _1 _1 _1 0
f=: 13 :'*@:(-/~)i.y'
f
[ *@:(-/~) i.
g=: 13
30 matches
Mail list logo
