I forgot to address that, but yes, it was self answered.
` is a combining operation - a fundamental reason for obtaining a
gerund is so that you can manipulate a sequence of verbs rather than
just an individual verb. So in contexts like this where we only want
a single verb, we combine it with th
Raul, I have modified your adverb lim as follows:
limr =: 1 : 0
lastgood =. ] {~ 0 i:~ 0 = y - y + ]
u y + lastgood (1e_6*1>.|y)*0.5^i.1000
)
% limr 0
5.35754303593134e306
NB. _
>. limr 0
1
NB. 1
<. limr 0
0
NB. 0
%@^. limr 1
4.5035996273705e15
NB. _
%@^. limr 0
_
Raul,
Your explanations below help.
I don't believe you addressed this question, though (was that because
it was self-answered?):
"I don't understand the mechanism of altSeq, in particular what the `'' at
the end is doing. Gerund with the empty string? Is that just to
enforce the creation of a ge
NB. work on limit from right of a function
lim =: 1 : 'u 1e_11 * 1 + <. 1e11 * y' NB. Arne Groeneveld gave me this
idea.
NB. This version evaluates u at a value greater than y, never at y itself.
NB. It attempts to approximate the limit from the right of u at y .
% l
Different for me:
0=0.5^1022+i.5
0 0 0 0 0
and
0=0.5^1071+i.5
0 0 0 0 1
I noticed the following
0.5^1075
0
0.5^1074
4.94066e_324
and decided to use i.1076.
On 02-03-13 16:58, km wrote:
Arne, have you considered
0=0.5^1022+i.5
0 1 1 1 1
--Kip
Sent from my iPad
On
Arne, have you considered
0=0.5^1022+i.5
0 1 1 1 1
--Kip
Sent from my iPad
On Mar 1, 2013, at 6:45 AM, Aai wrote:
> Here's a conjunction with the choice of left/right approach.
>
> It's like Raul's approach except it uses a bit more values and it compares
> successive values up to a l
A generic problem with generalities is over-generalization.
In this case, I was generalizing your original request by thinking
about what would happen if I added more layers. My thoughts were
about using a sequence of more than two gerunds, but I also tried to
think about arguments greater than r
According to my description I have to formulate limit as follows:
limit=: 2 :'({~1 i.~[:(}.=}:)<.&.(1e11&*)) u y v 0.5^i.1076'
otherwise the values are cut off at 11 decimals.
BTW 11 is a value obtained by experimenting with
((4%~])* 3 o. 1r2p1 * 1-])
as input.
On 01-03-13 20:20, km wrote:
