How about this
(1+i.n) u table 1+i.m
this will remove * by 0 and 0% whatever as well as whatever %0
For division it might be practical to use 1r1+i.m) if you wish to stay
with fractions
(1+i.5) % table 1r1+i.10
┌─┬──┐
│%│1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
Ignore - this is a test
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
blit {: |:#:!/~i.64x
|value error: hext
|blit[0]
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Devon McCormick wrote:
> You might try using "64x" instead of 64 as the argument.
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Michal Wallace
> wrote:
>
>> I just stumbled onto this image, and I have to say it
>> is prob
You might try using "64x" instead of 64 as the argument.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Michal Wallace
wrote:
> I just stumbled onto this image, and I have to say it
> is probably my favorite J image of all time.
>
> (replace blit with viewmat for a better picture)
>
>blit {: |:#:!/~i.64
>
I just stumbled onto this image, and I have to say it
is probably my favorite J image of all time.
(replace blit with viewmat for a better picture)
blit {: |:#:!/~i.64
▙
▙▙
▙ ▙
▙ ▙
▙▙ ▙▙
▙ ▙ ▙ ▙
▙ ▙
▙▙ ▙▙
▙ ▙ ▙ ▙
▙ ▙ ▙ ▙
▙▙ ▙▙ ▙▙ ▙▙
▙ ▙ ▙ ▙
Obverse/inverse applies to the monadic use of a verb. So,
+ b._1 NB. Conjugate
+
- b._1 NB. Negation
-
* b._1 NB. Signum. Cannot undo this.
|domain error
| *b._1
% b._1 NB. Inverse
%
When applied to a dyadic use it is interpreted as the left argument bound
to the verb making a m
I guess I better work on remembering it too! A helpful lesson.
Linda
-Original Message-
From: programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com
[mailto:programming-boun...@forums.jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of robert therriault
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2015 11:12 AM
To: programm...@jsoftware.com
S
This is from the vocabulary:
The obverse (which is normally the inverse) is specified for six cases:
1.
The self-inverse functions + - -. % %. |. |: /: [ ] C. p.
Why is * deleted from the list? What is the inverse of * ?
If that is correct, then shouldn't + be deleted from the list?
Hi Linda,
The way I remember this effect is to imagine that when you define a verb
tacitly the last step is to parenthesize it in your mind.
So,
> enc =: ;@:( enc =: (;@:( ;( enc2 =: ;( enc2 =: (;( wrote:
>
>
> This is odd, Pascal
>
>
>
> Remove @: in one situation and the results agree.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIMD
I'd say that slightly differently:
J has been *implemented* as a single instruction multiple data language.
There is nothing in the syntax of the language, nor in the dictionary
description of the language, which prevents a multiple instruction
implementation.
Bill, both give:
'"/home/thomas/downloads/j64-803/tools/regex/libjpcre.so" regexec + i *x *c
x *i i'&(15!:0)
Chris, there must be something very strange about my setup. I am using Arch
Linux. Does jqt cause any library loads to be intercepted? These steps
reproduce the behavior on my machine:
J is a single data multi-instruction language. The trains and many of
the adverbs and conjunctions control data flow. enc2 is a hook. Below,
find where A appears in the explicit equivalent sentence.
boxdraw_j_ 1
enc2 =: ;(
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 02:31:07 -0500
From: "Linda Alvord"
To:
12 matches
Mail list logo
