I can't follow what the verb is doing, but I tried it on some other
cases & it produced correct results.
Needless to say, a much faster version is needed. Even the little piece
excP,
which potentially runs the verb < on each atom, would be too slow.
Henry Rich
On 2/29/2016 5:36 PM, Brian Sc
Ian,
Thanks for your kind words. The link I gave was a page of mine that had
links plus sample sections and the table of contents.
http://webbox.lafayette.edu/~reiterc/j/fvj4/index.html
Cool to know the amazon link is up and running. Though lulu is cheaper.
Lulu also has a pdf version:
http://ww
I have a non iterative script which seems to work on the test sample.
Can you tell me if it works more generally, please?
H =: 99 NB. can be any large value, like 1e6
L =: _1
D =: H, H, 1, H, 5, H, 8, H, 11, L, L, H, H, 20,3
P =: 1, 1, 1, 2, 4, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2
excP =: (1,L=])<;._1
I think you should post THAT review on Lulu -- it persuaded me.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 6:38 PM Ian Clark wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this up-to-date, Cliff. Eager for Part 2.
>
> This has long been on my bucket-list for serious study, of the sort I
> last gave to "At Play With J" by J doyen Ge
Hrm. I don't understand. It should definitely be (| j. 1:), not (] j. 1:).
The idea is that you're taking a line with length (%: n) and using it to
construct a line with length (%: n+1).
So for example, the distance (|) from 0j0 to 1j1 is (%: 2).
Now you want to make a right triangle whose sides
