I am thinking about resurrecting JUM. Or a son of JUM or some other flavour
of free (or nearly free) public JHS server. This will happen after we get
the release out.
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Brian Schott
wrote:
> I suspect that there are a few users or potential users who work for
> com
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Brian Schott wrote:
> *My take on the usefulness of JHS is that it requires a web server
> or service that runs J/JHS. As far as I know there is no such free
> service, even for personal use. So either a benefactor who will
> provide a service must be found or ind
I suspect that there are a few users or potential users who work for companies
which would fund in a heartbeat a necessary server* even for a very simple JHS
app. And my guess is that such users would most want a working example of JUM
to show how individuals can have their own workspace for t
Joe
>i of course, as most folk do not care about the data. i am only interested in
>my data of the day:-) What is interesting to me is the TOOL, and how it can be
>applied to ANY data. Google and most tech companies are pushing ML now. i
>found their ~playground tool fascinating and useful. If
