This seems like an unusual design decision:
(t 3 3) -: t 3 3 3 3 3
1
--
Raul
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 12:57 AM, robert therriault
wrote:
> If i: were redefined with monadic rank 1 then this definition of t could be a
> replacement for i:
>
>t=: ({: +/&i: {.)`i:@.(1=#)
>t 3
> _3 _2 _
If i: were redefined with monadic rank 1 then this definition of t could be a
replacement for i:
t=: ({: +/&i: {.)`i:@.(1=#)
t 3
_3 _2 _1 0 1 2 3
t 3 3
_6 _5 _4 _3 _2 _1 0
_5 _4 _3 _2 _1 0 1
_4 _3 _2 _1 0 1 2
_3 _2 _1 0 1 2 3
_2 _1 0 1 2 3 4
_1 0 1 2 3 4 5
0 1 2 3 4
The rank of i. is not zero, but it's difficult to see how a variant on
i: could use that approach.
If you get to messing with padding, you might also want to be messing
with left/center/right alignment.
That's all I can think of right now.
--
Raul
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:40 PM, robert therri
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Adam Tornhill wrote:
>> 30 december 2016 15:27 skrev Don Guinn :
>> Obverse (:.) allows one to define an obverse to a user defined verb.
>
> Thanks! Is this also the way the obverses of primitives are defined in the
> implementation of J?
No, but it is closely rel
The problem that I originally reported is with "internal" lr, as a verb that is
functional, cannot be reassigned to its LR.
ar =: 1 : '5!:1 <''u'''
[ `(1 ar)`]}
is not the same as this result
[`1`]}
though actual lr does not try to get as fancy with substituting `
lr ] ` (1 ar) ` ]
(<,']
Operands to modifiers such as m}, ^:n, m`, and `n are flagged if they
are recognized as gerunds.
This seems to me to be a mistake for m` and `n: they should not be
flagged until the derived adverb has been executed. The problem you
report is that m/n are interpreted as if they had come from c
Unfortunately, the username, PepeQuintana, that used to work for the J
website stop doing so awhile ago. I also unsubscribed another email
account to other J forums, that was easy; but, although I completed a new
subscription without errors, using this mail account, I could not post to
the other J
I was looking at the ranks of primitives and was wondering if there was a
particular justification for the rank of monadic i: (Steps) being 0. In fact, I
began this by looking at monadic #: (Antibase 2) and wondering why its rank was
_ . Both verbs seem to act on their arguments in similar ways
> 30 december 2016 15:27 skrev Don Guinn :
>
> Obverse (:.) allows one to define an obverse to a user defined verb.
Thanks! Is this also the way the obverses of primitives are defined in the
implementation of J?
--
For informa
This was a bug in memoization (M.). A memory block was freed twice. I
have fixed it.
The error might be a longstanding problem - I'm not sure. In 32-bit
J6.02 the sentence executes but gives a different result (one that is
smaller than 50 f 167, so I think the J6.02 result is wrong).
Or,
Please make sure this is on the bug list (Errors) in the Wiki.
Henry Rich
On 1/3/2017 11:18 AM, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
Sorry, I pressed the wrong button and my previous message was incomplete;
this should have been the full message:
I am afraid it is the superbug that has been discovered a
Sorry, I pressed the wrong button and my previous message was incomplete;
this should have been the full message:
I am afraid it is the superbug that has been discovered and rediscovered a
few times; see [0, 1, 2 and 3].
References
[0] [Jprogramming] Table of Verbs, Jose Mario Quintana
http:
I am afraid it is the superbug that has been discovered and rediscovered a
few times; see [0, 1, 2 and 3].
References
[0] [Jprogramming] Table of Verbs, Jose Mario Quintana
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2013-April/032358.html
[1] [Jprogramming] tacit adverb, Dan Bron
ht
This file works j804 and j805, when copied and run with F8, you may need to fix
newlines
NB.
NB. Wicked Tacit Toolkit...
NB.
NB. Load it usin
14 matches
Mail list logo
