Send papers to i...@journalofj.com
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
Xiao,
200 training patterns, 4 inputs, 1 output each, 3 hidden neurodes:
(SWI Prolog / Bash)
swipl -s bamc.4c.pl -g main --f 'f1.csv' --n --o c --h 3
or
F0=$(mktemp)`; F=$(mktemp); runswipl bamc.4c.pl main $F0 200 'f1.csv'
3 2&> $F
runtimes:
C ~4 sec
J ~ 9sec
Prolog ~ 3156 sec
J:
Thank you. Interesting observation.
Any chance to get that fixed/patched in J805?
> On 18 Apr 2017, at 13:27, David Mitchell wrote:
>
> Folks,
>
> I tried some tests using Excel's com interface and j.dll from j602, j804,
> j805 and j64-806, all on Windows 10. I found these things.
>
> 1. The
Folks,
I tried some tests using Excel's com interface and j.dll from j602, j804, j805
and j64-806, all on Windows 10. I found these things.
1. The built-in registration with j602 ("%~dp0j.exe" /regserver) continues to
work. It registered j.exe and j.dll and I was able to use j.dll in Excel
> On Apr 18, 2017, at 12:08 PM, Michael Goodrich
> wrote:
>
> Actually I don't mind sharing the current J version. It is immature and
> little more than a transliteration of the basic C code. I hope eventually to
> have it all loopless, etc with proper ranking and tacitness. I have both
>
Btw please note that the defined monad 'sgmd' is *outperforming* the primitive
tanh !
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Xiao-Yong Jin wrote:
>
>
>> On Apr 18, 2017, at 9:23 AM, Michael Goodrich
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Henry,
>>
>> Thanks for your interest. I owe you some bet
Actually I don't mind sharing the current J version. It is immature and little
more than a transliteration of the basic C code. I hope eventually to have it
all loopless, etc with proper ranking and tacitness. I have both Prolog and
Haskell versions but J is somewhat different than Haskell -
> On Apr 18, 2017, at 9:23 AM, Michael Goodrich
> wrote:
>
> Hi Henry,
>
> Thanks for your interest. I owe you some better information.
>
> First off its not really an apples-apples comparison as the C version is
> very mature with some performance tricks designed to reduce calculations to
>
Hi Henry,
Thanks for your interest. I owe you some better information.
First off its not really an apples-apples comparison as the C version is
very mature with some performance tricks designed to reduce calculations to
the bare minimum (e.g., do not recalculate matrices but instead do selected
