This turned into a nice way to introduce explicit definiions with multiple
lines.
T is for top, S for side, and A for all the log mantissas.
T=: 0.01*i.10
s=: 13 :'y+0.1*i.50'
S=:s 0
A=: 10^.S+/T
(('10^.x+y');,.S),.(8j2":T);8j4":A
T=: 0.01*i.10
s=: 13 :'y+0.1*i.50'
S=:s 5
A=: 10^.S+
The possibility of a forum dealing with the extended variations would
be useful in that the present forum would then deal with more realistic
problems rather than the more esoteric ones. We don't need to slow
down operations, useful to all, to satisfy the needs of a few.
Any digital express
I think this proposal would require, at minimum, a rewrite of ve.c
Also, each primitive which takes numeric arguments and/or produces a
numeric result would need a test to make sure it behaved properly for
each different mode of number handling.
Want to take a crack at it?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On
Sure, one can and you are not alone. Personally, I prefer other means, for
example,
erase ' p q'
1 1
".@:('p'"_)@:('p' =.. ]) 'erling'
erling
('q' =.. ])@:<@:".@:('p'"_)@:('p' =.. ]) 'erling'
┌──┐
│erling│
└──┘
p (,&:<) q
┌──┬┐
│erling│┌──┐│
