Re: [Jprogramming] bug in latest beta and source

2018-06-29 Thread bill lam
I also noticed several tests will fail and can even isolated the data to run a reproducible failure, but I think those are just rounding errors. Perhaps it should relax the tolerance. On Sat, Jun 30, 2018, 9:59 AM Bill Heagy wrote: > If I run test/g410.ijs often enough, I get: > > 100 RUN2 'g410

[Jprogramming] bug in latest beta and source

2018-06-29 Thread Bill Heagy
If I run test/g410.ijs often enough, I get: 100 RUN2 'g410' ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (g = gamma) x=: _4.1 _4.9 4.1 4.9 j./_0.4 _0.5 0.4 0.5 _4 _5 4 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 (g =!.1e_12 gamma) 1.5 1 (g =!.1e_12 gamma) 1r3 1r2 2r3 1 1 1 (g =!.1e_

Re: [Jprogramming] J807 beta-f available

2018-06-29 Thread chris burke
This works for me on High Sierra. Please try allowing apps from anywhere. In System Preferences|Security & Privacy|General tab select "Allow applications downloaded from: anywhere" and see if you can now run jconsole. See also https://support.apple.com/en-ca/ht202491 . On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:

Re: [Jprogramming] J807 beta-f available

2018-06-29 Thread Joey K Tuttle
Report on a clean and working install under OS X 10.14 Mojave beta. Things seem to be working very nicely. So far I'm quite liking Mojave. Here, for people willing to suffer the , was what I did to be happy with having J807 beta-f running in Mac OS Mojave 10.14 - Starting from the instructions

Re: [Jprogramming] J807 beta-f available

2018-06-29 Thread Brian Schott
I have Mac El Capitan 10.11.6. When I right click and then Open jconsole in brian/j64-807/bin an alert window says the file I have attempted to open is damaged and invites me to send it to the Trash. I have downloaded again with the same result. -

[Jprogramming] J807 beta-f available

2018-06-29 Thread Eric Iverson
J807 beta-f is now available for window/linux/macos. The install page for zip packages has been updated and this should make life easier. This is a step forward. Please be an early adopter! -- For information about J forums see h

Re: [Jprogramming] Proposal for a new table adverb

2018-06-29 Thread Raul Miller
Here's a tentative implementation of part of what I think you have described: commute=:3 :0 assert.2=#$y assert.=/$y assert. 0={.u b. 0 mask=. <:/~i.#y inds=. (>. |:)mask*i.$y inds{u mask #&, y ) That said, I don't think this would work for you - this winds up testing each item indepe

[Jprogramming] Proposal for a new table adverb

2018-06-29 Thread David Lambert
I have an equality test. If a=b then b=a . (In my case "find overlapping spheres", in other words the equality test may be non-trivial.) The new adverb would compute only the upper triangular set of cases and thereby save about half the time. NB. assuming the main diagonal could be interesti