Adverse (u :: v) properly passes THROW up to higher levels to be
caught. In the test, nothing caught it. It's a test error.
I have modified the test so it doesn't create EVTHROW.
Fixed in the latest commit.
Henry Rich
On 7/24/2018 5:39 PM, Bill Heagy wrote:
With the right starting random s
Does JDo work at all in this setup, that’s what I was wanting to see...
Thanks,
—
Raul
On Tuesday, July 24, 2018, Sergey Kamenev wrote:
> On 24.07.2018 21:32, Raul Miller wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM Sergey Kamenev
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I working under Gentoo linux based distributiv
Some error codes are generated internally and shouldn't be used by 13!:8
. I'll need to think about what to do if the user picks one of them.
Thanks,
Henry Rich
On 7/24/2018 5:39 PM, Bill Heagy wrote:
With the right starting random state:
RUN1'g13x'
13!:8 :: 1: x=: >: ?255
|uncaught th
With the right starting random state:
RUN1'g13x'
13!:8 :: 1: x=: >: ?255
|uncaught throw.
This happens for x=35.
linux 32bit or nonavx64.
JVERSION
Engine: j806/j32/linux
Beta: GPL3/2018-07-19T22:48:16
Library: 8.05.14
Platform: Linux 32
Installer: unknown
InstallPath: /home/wheagy/tmp/jbl
On 24.07.2018 21:32, Raul Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM Sergey Kamenev wrote:
I working under Gentoo linux based distributive (Calculate Linux)
I have not built any working examples of calling a j sub-process under linux.
Can you point me at something illustrative and simple,
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 2:10 PM Sergey Kamenev wrote:
> I working under Gentoo linux based distributive (Calculate Linux)
I have not built any working examples of calling a j sub-process under linux.
Can you point me at something illustrative and simple, but complete?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On 24.07.2018 19:27, Raul Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:04 PM Sergey Kamenev wrote:
But I not know how use use same address layout in all part of program.
JDo allow only new session for J code
Try it (pulling the id and sending it to another process) and see if
that works for yo
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 12:04 PM Sergey Kamenev wrote:
> But I not know how use use same address layout in all part of program.
> JDo allow only new session for J code
Try it (pulling the id and sending it to another process) and see if
that works for you?
To go further, we'd have to know ab
We need to port J to the Transputer ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transputer
SCNR
;)
On 24.07.2018 18:04, Sergey Kamenev wrote:
On 24.07.2018 17:26, Raul Miller wrote:
Have you considered using a initial J session to launch
your “main script”?
No.
I using executable script file like:
--
On 24.07.2018 17:26, Raul Miller wrote:
Have you considered using a initial J session to launch your “main script”?
No.
I using executable script file like:
---
#!/usr/bin/env jconsole
J-code
---
Anyways, if all processes use the same address layout for the re
On 24.07.2018 17:43, Henry Rich wrote:
To amplify what Eric said:
Two threads cannot have access to the same J namespaces. There are currently
no locking mechanisms to allow two tasks to modify the same tables. Nor does
the memory allocator work if one thread allocates a block and another th
The J front-end knows about them. You can modify the j front-end to provide
their values during booting up.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018, 9:45 PM Sergey Kamenev wrote:
> Hi, Eric!
>
> > Why not just load your main script and then use the functions and
> variables
> > directly.
>
> You offer me using a t
Actually, my parenthetical suggestion should have been for {>{ A
${;{'a bc',&<&;:'def ghij'
1 3 1 4 2 3 2 4
${>{'a bc',&<&;:'def ghij'
2 2 2 4
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 7:13 PM Raul Miller wrote:
>
> What would a higher ranked catalogue do? How would this be useful?
>
> (T
To amplify what Eric said:
Two threads cannot have access to the same J namespaces. There are
currently no locking mechanisms to allow two tasks to modify the same
tables. Nor does the memory allocator work if one thread allocates a
block and another thread frees it.
You could share data b
How would that work?
Thanks,
—
Raul
On Monday, July 23, 2018, Don Guinn wrote:
> I'm not sure this is something to be investigated at this time. Because I
> suspect that changing it's rank would not a trivial thing. All I asked is
> why the rank was set to 1. It appears pretty useless to me. H
You have an unusual, but interesting scenario. I apologize as I really do
not have the time to think about this properly.
Is this what you are trying to do:
Main - normal J task - for example, in jconsole
Main J task starts a sub task (which we will call A) with: p=. (libj,'
JInit x') cd ''
Th
Have you considered using a initial J session to launch your “main script”?
(Which would then start jhs or whatever, for development purposes...)
That said, virtual address randomization (or other anti-malware practices)
might defeat this approach. (So you might also have to disable that.)
Anywa
Hi, Eric!
Why not just load your main script and then use the functions and variables
directly.
You offer me using a trick.
This trick make debug more complicated.
Perhaps you could give a very simple example of exactly what you want to
do. It is not clear what you meany by "return of a sess
Sergey,
I do not understand what you are asking for.
Why not just load your main script and then use the functions and variables
directly.
Perhaps you could give a very simple example of exactly what you want to
do. It is not clear what you meany by "return of a session of the main J
script'.
O
On 24.07.2018 01:12, Eric Iverson wrote:
Why not just run the expression
you want to run?
It is a pity.
My expression need multiple function and variables from my main J script.
It would be useful to add to libj.so function for return of a session of the
main J script.
Sergey.
--
20 matches
Mail list logo
