Thanks, Bill
Mike
Sent from my iPad
> On 3 Oct 2019, at 00:46, bill lam wrote:
>
> Correct. jandroid and raspberry pi always lag behind.
>
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, 7:19 AM 'Mike Day' via Programming <
> programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
>
>> I’m getting to grips, at last, with an Android phon
Thanks Roger. I have run into this issue a couple of times, and I knew J
must have a solution. I just need to remember the double reverse scheme
(reverse the noun order & reverse the dyad execution).
Skip
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 12:18 AM Roger Hui wrote:
>%~/ |. 1 2 3 4 5
> 0.0083
>
>
>
%~/ |. 1 2 3 4 5
0.0083
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 9:44 PM Skip Cave wrote:
> I can write:
> 1%(2%(3%(4%5)))
>
> 1.875
>
>
> Using insert, I can simplify:
>
> %/1 2 3 4 5
>
> 1.875
>
>
> Now I can write:
>
> (((1%2)%3)%4)%5
>
> 0.00833
>
>
> How can I use insert to simplify this?
I can write:
1%(2%(3%(4%5)))
1.875
Using insert, I can simplify:
%/1 2 3 4 5
1.875
Now I can write:
(((1%2)%3)%4)%5
0.00833
How can I use insert to simplify this?
Skip Cave
--
For information about J forums
Sounds like a good outcome. Nice work!!
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 11:59 AM bill lam wrote:
> jconsole should now detect different versions of libedit and load it at run
> time, so that it should always succeed unless libedit had not been
> installed, in that case jconsole falls back to use line noi
Correct. jandroid and raspberry pi always lag behind.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, 7:19 AM 'Mike Day' via Programming <
programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
> I’m getting to grips, at last, with an Android phone. I’ve managed to
> download J901 a couple of times; the latest beta still appears to be
> vers
I’m getting to grips, at last, with an Android phone. I’ve managed to download
J901 a couple of times; the latest beta still appears to be version “l” . Is
that correct?
No rush necessary for me, just curious.
Thanks,
Mike
Sent from my iPad
> On 2 Oct 2019, at 17:57, Eric Iverson wrote:
jconsole should now detect different versions of libedit and load it at run
time, so that it should always succeed unless libedit had not been
installed, in that case jconsole falls back to use line noise library,
where file tab completion is not supported.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, 5:00 AM Ric Sherloc
Thanks Eric,
Yeah that makes sense. I've installed the latest tar (beta k) and updated
the engine to beta m. I can confirm that jconsole shortcuts are working as
expected now.
Cheers,
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 9:43 AM Eric Iverson
wrote:
> Ric, re 901 jconsole:
> je_update only updates the JE sha
You could be using different versions of jconsole so that should be
checked. Perhaps easiest by just getting the latest from the
download/jengine/
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:53 PM Joey K Tuttle wrote:
> ctrl+z is working for me (to suspend the j process and I can later return
> to it with %) in Ub
ctrl+z is working for me (to suspend the j process and I can later return to it
with %) in Ubuntu terminal sessions.
> On 2019Oct 2, at 13:42, Eric Iverson wrote:
>
> Ric, re 901 jconsole:
> je_update only updates the JE shared library. The jconsole you are running
> will be the one from the
Ric, re 901 jconsole:
je_update only updates the JE shared library. The jconsole you are running
will be the one from the last beta install you did. I am not sure on the
status of this and will wait for Bill to comment.
The latest jconsole binary will have been uploaded and will be at the
downlo
I note that jconsole in the m beta no longer appears to support ctrl+z for
me on Ubuntu (WSL)?
There appears to be support for a couple of shortcuts (e.g. Ctrl+w :delete
word to left, and Ctrl+u :delete entire line) but no tab-completion of file
names.
It would be good to get an update on the chan
Listed under "Requests" here:
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/Interpreter/Requests#Support_inverse_for_I._y
Forum discussions:
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2006-April/026874.html
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2010-September/020281.html
http://www.jsoftware.com
Consider
I. 1 0 1 0 0 0
0 2
(e.~ [: i. 1 + >./) I. 1 0 1
1 0 1
(e.~ [: i. 1 + >./) I. 1 0 1 0 0 0
1 0 1
How long should the result be?
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:50 PM Michal Wallace wrote:
>
> Does I.inv have a working implementation?
>
> I'd expect the domain to b
For people running a unixy system (linux, osx, maybe even cygwin
[untested]) who have j901 installed in their home directory, here's a
shell script to update J:
#!/bin/sh
$HOME/j901/bin/jconsole <<___
load'pacman'
je_update_jpacman_''
___
echo JVERSION | $HOME/j901/bin/jconsole
(I got tired o
901-beta-m is available.
This fixes a few bugs found in the previous beta.
We are near the end of the beta cycle and expect the official 901 release
to be in early November.
Please move to using the latest beta now and help make sure the final
release is as solid as possible.
---
Does I.inv have a working implementation?
I'd expect the domain to be any ascending sequence of positive whole
numbers (possibly with repeats):
3 4 9 e.~ i.10
0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
I. 3 4 9 e.~ i.10
3 4 9
I. (i.@:>:@(>./) e. ]) 3 4 9NB. hypothetical I.inv, doesn't handle
repeats
3 4 9
This was submitted in math-fun
https://rule30prize.org
https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2019/10/announcing-the-rule-30-prizes
R.E. Boss
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
19 matches
Mail list logo
