Well said. Why don't you put that into the NuVoc page for Key at an
appropriate place?
For 9.01 and later, prefer u. to u .
You might need some examples of sc.
Henry Rich
On 10/14/2019 5:35 PM, Louis de Forcrand wrote:
If this makes it any clearer, here is an implementation of /. key:
key=
If this makes it any clearer, here is an implementation of /. key:
key=: 1 : 0
=@[ u@# ]
)
where = self-classify can itself be defined as
sc=: ~. -:"_ _1"_1 _ ]
Cheers,
Louis
> On 14 Oct 2019, at 21:26, Raul Miller wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what you mean, but consider:
>
> 'abcba' +--+--+
Personally, I would like the property that <. on gaussian (or complex)
integers is an identity function. So this seems promising.
But what does this do to the euclidean algorithm? (Are there examples
where it breaks? If so, what has to happen for it to work with
gaussian integers?)
Thanks,
--
Ra
I guess you'd better send me or post here script you use to create this,
because I didn't see that error.
Henry Rich
On 10/14/2019 5:02 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:55 PM Henry Rich wrote:
Clicking on the result should open the window that lets you select from
one of the
Er... calcdispframe, on line 13711, since there seem to be fifteen
different definitions of calcdispframe in dissect.ijs...
(Obviously I've not studied the overall structure of the code...)
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 5:02 PM Raul Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:55 PM
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 3:55 PM Henry Rich wrote:
> Clicking on the result should open the window that lets you select from
> one of the executions of u. Clicking in that result should expand u.
> It doesn't work, and it will be quite a while before I can look into
> it. If you want to try to de
Here's a description of my floor model and how I arrived at it (after
discussion with colleagues at Dyalog). There's some code at the bottom
to generate pictures, which will probably help when reading. It's not
quite identical to the proposal for Dyalog APL: Dyalog's real floor uses
absolute tolera
Clicking on the result should open the window that lets you select from
one of the executions of u. Clicking in that result should expand u.
It doesn't work, and it will be quite a while before I can look into
it. If you want to try to debug it, bless you, and I'll help.
Henry Rich
On 10/1
(is this the right forum for talking about j packages?)
I was trying to flesh out the comments on
http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Functional_coverage_tree#J today, and I
noticed that dissect is not as illuminating as I had expected for the
expression:
dissect 'weight ((] (1}.~.parent)}~ 1}. * %&(pare
I'm not sure what you mean, but consider:
'abcba' wrote:
>
> Yes, much. That seems not the case for a character array left argument, thus
> my confusion. Thank you!
> What other arguments/verbs play nice with /, ?
>
> > On Oct 14, 2019, at 3:05 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
> >
> > Ok, try this:
Yes, much. That seems not the case for a character array left argument, thus my
confusion. Thank you!
What other arguments/verbs play nice with /, ?
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 3:05 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
>
> Ok, try this:
>
> 1 2 3 2 1 +--+--+-+
> |ae|bd|c|
> +--+--+-+
>
> The nub of the left
Ok, try this:
1 2 3 2 1 wrote:
>
> Sorry, I'm still stuck on u=#. (Or "," or "<" or "[" ). I'll try to
> understand some harder working verbs, perhaps + or ! or I. or e?
>
> > On Oct 14, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:06 PM 'Jim Russell' via Program
Sorry, I'm still stuck on u=#. (Or "," or "<" or "[" ). I'll try to understand
some harder working verbs, perhaps + or ! or I. or e?
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Raul Miller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:06 PM 'Jim Russell' via Programming
> wrote:
>> Thank you Raul! I thought I wa
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:06 PM 'Jim Russell' via Programming
wrote:
> Thank you Raul! I thought I was agreeing, until I got to the following:
>
> > On Oct 14, 2019, at 11:40 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
> >
> > So ... it's the "only the nub" which is relevant here, if you do not
> > care about the ca
Thank you Raul! I thought I was agreeing, until I got to the following:
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 11:40 AM, Raul Miller wrote:
>
> So ... it's the "only the nub" which is relevant here, if you do not
> care about the calculation which produces the result.
What calculation? What would be different i
The left argument defines the structure of the result.
The count of the nub of the left argument defines the number of items
of the result. The order of the nub defines the order of the items of
the result.
The values of the left argument specify which item of the right
argument go into which ite
16 matches
Mail list logo
