Fair enough. Thank you for the clarity.
Henry Rich wrote:
> My build setup depends on considerations that transcend this
> discussion. Take it as given.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 1/30/2020 10:43 PM, ethiejiesa via Programming wrote:
> > Hrm. That's quite odd.
> >
> > The workaround is quite easy,
What little J under *nix I've done was in emacs which is best for me.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:54 PM 'Sergey Kamenev' via Programming <
programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
> 30.01.2020 20:31, Raul Miller:
> > "Best" requires context.
> >
> > I probably use the jqt environment the most, but there
There's a simple verb to display the internal representation of a object at
the end of the essay on J's internal representation at
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/User:Devon_McCormick/Data/JInternalRepresentation
.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 6:28 PM Raul Miller wrote:
> 3!:3 y gives you a hex dump
My build setup depends on considerations that transcend this
discussion. Take it as given.
Henry Rich
On 1/30/2020 10:43 PM, ethiejiesa via Programming wrote:
Hrm. That's quite odd.
The workaround is quite easy, but any other J package maintainers for linux
distributions are likely to run in
Start with
x u c v y
where c is an explicit definition.
The first execution is (u c v). This has available the text of c, and
the values of u and v.
If the text of c does not refer to x or y, it is simply executed on the
given u/v and can produce any part of speech.
But if the text of c
Hrm. That's quite odd.
The workaround is quite easy, but any other J package maintainers for linux
distributions are likely to run into this. Since it seems to have been
introduced recently between d and e, ideally, we could find a way to smooth
over the quirk that breaks neither your nor path-agn
Also, including an offending piece of code usually will make it clearer
what the issue is.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:05 PM bill lam wrote:
> If you are writing adverb and conjunction using explicit
> definition, then you are actually defining them using verbs
> and a verb must return a noun oth
If you are writing adverb and conjunction using explicit
definition, then you are actually defining them using verbs
and a verb must return a noun otherwise syntax error.
I usually debug using dbr 1 but others may prefer gui debug
ctrl-k.
Fri, 31 Jan 2020, Raoul Schorer написал(а):
> Hi,
>
> I
Hi,
I wrote a dyadic conjunction, that I call as:
x u conj v y, where x u v y are all nouns
However, I get the error "noun result was required". My conjunction
actually yields a "suspended function" (thunk) in the form of a string
wrapped in the "_ verb, as in ('recursive_function')"_
I have two
3!:3 y gives you a hex dump of y, including the array header.
So, for example, you could inspect a "boolean" array for yourself:
3!:3]1 p: i.99
Or: the "boolean" array type is represented as C bytes.
(This is because bits are not addressable and for typical cases the
consequence of a packed b
Hi!
I read https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/System/ReleaseNotes/J901.
It says about improving the performance of Boolean arrays.
Is it due to the fact that it is stored in memory as bits, or as bytes, or
still as integers?
Sergey.
I managed to delete my Jjhs desktop icon from my Mac mini, and failed to
recreate it. I finally had to do a complete reinstall of J to recover. Any
ideas what MacOS magic I was missing?
--
For information about J forums see http:
The funny includes are required on the build system I use. If you put
your source under a /jsource directory you will be able to use the files
as is.
Henry Rich
On 1/29/2020 11:47 PM, ethiejiesa via Programming wrote:
Compilation on linux breaks for me:
../../../../jsrc/cip.c:6:10: fat
30.01.2020 20:31, Raul Miller:
"Best" requires context.
I probably use the jqt environment the most, but there are some tasks
where jhs is just a better interface.
But, also, if I'm targeting a unix command line environment, I might
be using vi+jconsole
I have never used Kate+konsole for j pro
"Best" requires context.
I probably use the jqt environment the most, but there are some tasks
where jhs is just a better interface.
But, also, if I'm targeting a unix command line environment, I might
be using vi+jconsole
I have never used Kate+konsole for j programming.
FYI,
--
Raul
On Thu
Hi!
1) JQt
2) Kate + konsole
3) your option
Sergey.
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
16 matches
Mail list logo
