Agreed!
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 10:57 AM Raul Miller wrote:
>
> I would keep in mind that one advantage of redundant information (such
> as redundant parenthesis) is that this can let you ignore some
> surrounding issues.
>
> That is not always the best tactic - it often pays to have a deep
> un
Yes, > ((<,'/')`(<(<,'@')`(<
> /(@(g h))
Excellent, thanks! I had the feeling that there could be such a form but I
could not find it quickly late last night.
> So your D2 definition is already part of the implementation.
Yes, the point of D2 is to legitimize a useful bug/feature of the current
I would keep in mind that one advantage of redundant information (such
as redundant parenthesis) is that this can let you ignore some
surrounding issues.
That is not always the best tactic - it often pays to have a deep
understanding - but the ability to focus attention where it's needed
is crucia
Your interesting new example is
(<,'/')`(<(<,'@')`(<(<,'2'), wrote:
> You are suggesting that a list of ARs be construed as a valid AR.
No, I would not dare to mess with the description of what an AR is.
Probably the source of the confusion was my unfortunate use of the phrases
"M represe
Hi,
In the non linear least squares lab:
Nwtn =: adverb def 'y - (u y)%(u D.1 y)'
|spelling error
| y - (u y)%(u D.1 y)
| ^
| Nwtn=:adverb def'y - (u y)%(u D.1 y)'
I understand the D. function is obsolete in 901, will there be an update of
the lab?
Best regards,
Dimitri
