for a more general solution,
NB. if you don’t need any other settings in x, and y is complex
Plot =: 'aspect 1; itemcolor blue,white' plot (,: |.&.+.)
Plot 0.5*_1^3%~i.7
Am 10.02.21 um 04:10 schrieb Hauke Rehr:
> 'aspect 1; itemcolor blue,white' plot (,: (_1^1r6)&*) 0.5*_1^3%~i.7
--
--
If you don’t mind the breaks in the lines:
'aspect 1; itemcolor blue,white' plot (,: (_1^1r6)&*) 0.5*_1^3%~i.7
Am 10.02.21 um 02:44 schrieb Devon McCormick:
> Yes, I suspect this is at the root of the problem. "Plot" probably sizes
> the frame based on the range of values of each axis.
>
> O
These illustrate that there is some sort of rectangularization going on:
'title Skinny Tall Plot' plot tall=. 0 1j100 1j200 1j300 1j400 0.5j500
_1j500 _1j400 _1j300 _0.5j200 _0.5j100 0
'title Skinny Wide Plot' plot wide=. 0j0 100j1 200j1 300j1 400j1 500j0.5
500j_1 400j_1 300j_1 200j_0.5 100j
Yes, I suspect this is at the root of the problem. "Plot" probably sizes
the frame based on the range of values of each axis.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 8:29 PM bill lam wrote:
> The hexagon has vertices on x axis but the flat side on y axis. the
> distance between opposite vertices is longer than
Right, there seems something wrong.
I would use a more naive way to measure. print 2 copies on paper, overlap
them together and then rotate 1 of them to check if they match exactly.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, 9:27 AM Devon McCormick wrote:
> I'm only plotting to PDF. What I did to "measure" it was
The hexagon has vertices on x axis but the flat side on y axis. the
distance between opposite vertices is longer than the distance between
opposite sides.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, 9:13 AM Ric Sherlock wrote:
> I enlarged the plot window, took a screenshot and then measured the
> distance between _0
I'm only plotting to PDF. What I did to "measure" it was to bring a
screenshot into a paint program, cut off the top (horizontal) side, add
perpendicular lines at each corner, rotate it 60 degrees then paste it back
onto the original picture, lining it up with the top right edge. This is
all show
I enlarged the plot window, took a screenshot and then measured the
distance between _0.8 to 0.8 on the two axes using an on-screen ruler, the
Y-axis distance is about a centimetre longer than the X-axis distance.
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:52 PM bill lam wrote:
> I think it's ok to have differen
I think it's ok to have different axis length, but the unit of each axis
should have the same physical length. Is this a bug in qt output only? Did
you try output to pdf and then print it out on paper, and measure the
length of each side of the hexagon using a ruler?
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021, 7:42 AM
Well, on my screen the hexagon looks too tall and the y-axis has extremes
of (_0.4, 0.4) whereas the x-axis goes from _0.5 to 0.5, so it does not
look properly regular.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:19 PM 'Bo Jacoby' via Programming <
programm...@jsoftware.com> wrote:
> Devon - 'aspect 1' plot 0.5*_1
Devon - 'aspect 1' plot 0.5*_1^3%~i.7 looks perfect!
Den tirsdag den 9. februar 2021 03.12.52 CET skrev Devon McCormick
:
Hauke - you are correct. A hexagon can be thought of as six equilateral
triangles.
Bo - you are correct only for an unscaled hexagon. See how "'aspect 1'
plot 0.5*_
11 matches
Mail list logo
