Re: [Jprogramming] Modifier train tutorial (was: "fix" new trains)

2021-12-17 Thread 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
from your definition, -&% b. _1  NB. inverse exists %@- then -&% (+: &.) 2 3  NB. seems to be what you want? 1 1.5 -&% (+: &) 2 3 _1 _0.67 but  (- %) b. _1  NB. dyadic verbs don't have inverses |domain error you can assign an inverse to a dyadic verb and then dinv =: 2 : '[ (v i

Re: [Jprogramming] Modifier train tutorial (was: "fix" new trains)

2021-12-17 Thread Hauke Rehr
Okay, I’ll think through if and how this may generalize to • dyadic uses (I think I had applications for that, too) • and hooks (any sane interpretation? – I don’t remember a use case) and then write up a rfi or enhancement proposal or whatever. Thanks, Hauke Am 18.12.21 um 04:43 schrieb Henry

Re: [Jprogramming] Modifier train tutorial (was: "fix" new trains)

2021-12-17 Thread Henry Rich
At first look this seems reasonable.  Can you add it to the GitHub issues list? Henry Rich On 12/17/2021 10:17 PM, Hauke Rehr wrote: I’ll have to take some time digesting Pascal’s recent treatments of the modifier trains topic. Maybe I’ll get stuck and maybe I won’t dare tell you about my poi

Re: [Jprogramming] Modifier train tutorial (was: "fix" new trains)

2021-12-17 Thread 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
the naming scheme is  the single numbered modifiers are adverbs that return conjunctions.  The number is which position in (v0 v1 v2) the adverb u parameter is. the double numbered modifiers are conjunctions that return an adverb.  The 2 numbers in their name also refer to (v0 v1 v2) left numbe

Re: [Jprogramming] Modifier train tutorial (was: "fix" new trains)

2021-12-17 Thread Hauke Rehr
I’ll have to take some time digesting Pascal’s recent treatments of the modifier trains topic. Maybe I’ll get stuck and maybe I won’t dare tell you about my point of view for I used them too little. But there is one thing related to two very useful conjunctions: Under and Assign Obverse in combi

Re: [Jprogramming] Modifier train tutorial (was: "fix" new trains)

2021-12-17 Thread Raul Miller
But wait, there's more... For example: F12b=: {{u`v`}}`:6 The name is completely arbitrary (since I do not understand your F0..F12 naming scheme). But the behavior of F12b is like the behavior of F0 and/or F02. FYI, -- Raul On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 9:45 PM 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming

Re: [Jprogramming] Modifier train tutorial (was: "fix" new trains)

2021-12-17 Thread 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
J has gotten some powerful tools in 903 for making compound modifiers (modifiers that return other modifiers) and some interesting parentheses eliminations The following 6 modifiers create forks.  The 3 Fm ones are adverbs that return conjunction when n indicates the fork tine that is fixed by

Re: [Jprogramming] J903-release-a is available!

2021-12-17 Thread Thomas Bulka
Hi Eric, thanks to you and the whole Jsoftware team for the new release! It seems to work flawlessly on my linux machine and I'm excited to study the tacit modifiers during the holidays. Thanks again! Regards, Thomas Am Fr., 17. Dez. 2021 um 17:02 Uhr schrieb Eric Iverson : > > J903-release-a

[Jprogramming] J903-release-a is available!

2021-12-17 Thread Eric Iverson
J903-release-a is available in the zip installers at the Jsoftware web site. Windows All-in-One, Debian, and apk installers will be available shortly. It has been a long and productive year of beta releases and we now have a stable 903 release! You can't just upgrade the JE as you did during the