[Jprogramming] whodoneit?

2022-09-05 Thread Raul Miller
Here's a bit of introspection (beware email line wrap, this is a "one liner"): ;<@{{\:~y,.(<@#/.~,.~.) ::(y"_)boxopen@whichscript__y"0 nl__y 1 2 3[require'misc/miscutils/utils'}}"0 (Summarizes where definitions in active locales came from, though it has a big footprint in z.) FYI, -- Raul

Re: [Jprogramming] Remove first

2022-09-05 Thread Elijah Stone
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Essays/Progressive_Index-Of A good starting point. You can use it directly, given that x -. y is the same as x #~ -. x e. y, and x e. y is (#y) ~: y i. x. On Mon, 5 Sep 2022, Richard Donovan wrote: I need a verb similar to dyadic -. but which only removes ite

Re: [Jprogramming] Remove first

2022-09-05 Thread Henry Rich
https://code.jsoftware.com/wiki/Essays/Progressive_Index-Of Henry Rich On 9/5/2022 5:28 PM, Richard Donovan wrote: I need a verb similar to dyadic -. but which only removes items which are one for one specified by y. I want verb t such that... 'elect' t 'e' lect 'elected' t 'ee' lcted

[Jprogramming] Remove first

2022-09-05 Thread Richard Donovan
I need a verb similar to dyadic -. but which only removes items which are one for one specified by y. I want verb t such that... 'elect' t 'e' lect 'elected' t 'ee' lcted 'elected' t 'eet' lced 'elected' t 'dec' lete That is, the right argument is taken item by item and then removes th