LF ends a sentence and is not recognized as a valid part of a sentence.
Conceptually, this might be thought of as linguistic "space" set aside
for potential future enhancement (though that sort of thing needs
*very* careful consideration).
--
Raul
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 1:54 AM Razetime wrote
NuVoc indicates that numbers are separated by whitespace, but it seems
that ". does not recognize them as such. why?
_".'1',LF,'2'
_
_".'1',LF,'2'
_
--
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 12:52 AM Henry Rich wrote:
> I thought there was a rudimantary D.-replacement in the addon
> but my memory may be faulty.
Your memory is fine, mine... not so much.
Thanks,
--
Raul
--
For information abo
J already shares some of mathematica's strengths (interactivity, integrated
visualisation, data analysis). And I think a high quality symbolic
manipulator is well within reach. But
https://reference.wolfram.com/language/tutorial/SomeNotesOnInternalImplementation.html
gives some idea of its sh
I see, thanks. Comments indicate deriv is d. and pderiv is D.; I haven't
looked too closely yet.
Early macsyma would be great; like I said, I don't think mathematica is
remotely viable. I tried to provide a roadmap to get there because, from what
I can tell, the calculus addon is not even cl
The implementation of D. was buggy. I hope we can do better with the
addon. I thought there was a rudimantary D.-replacement in the addon
but my memory may be faulty.
With enough Jers contributing maybe this could be a competitor to
Mathematica. Time will tell.
Henry Rich
On 9/30/2022
Yes, rank 0 a valid assumption. Sort of:
J used to have two derivative words, d. (rank 0) and D. (jacobian).
As near as I can tell, the library only replaces d. and does not yet
provide a D. implementation.
That said... I would not think of this as a mathematica competitor --
more like an early
I have no control over the calculus addon, but I mark the equivalent treatment
of &. and &.: and therefore would like to ask a clarifying question. Is it
assumed that all verbs to be derived are applied monadically at rank 0? I can
imagine an implementation of multivariate calculus would be in
Hi folks,
Mostly as a heads-up: I just submitted a pull-request for the
math/calculus addon which adds hooks, under, NVV forks and fixes some
bugs.
You can find it here: https://github.com/jsoftware/math_calculus/pull/9 .
Any comments are highly appreciated!
My main motivation for messing around
