Re: [Jprogramming] Unexpected results (a bug?) in version 9 with some cases of cut (subarray)

2023-01-27 Thread Henry Rich
J9.04 is frozen for the release, but J9.05 will follow.  This thread has convinced me that sorting large arrays can be greatly improved by multithreading, and also that I can reduce the threading overhead. Henry Rich On 1/27/2023 6:07 AM, vadim wrote: What result do you get when you use this

Re: [Jprogramming] Unexpected results (a bug?) in version 9 with some cases of cut (subarray)

2023-01-27 Thread vadim
> What result do you get when you use this syntax? "Don't use master thread, use worker threads only", correct? So, I'm allocating 3 workers for 4 equal pieces of work; 3 workers finish doing their task each, then 2 of them are idle, and 1 alone does the 4th part? Interestingly, with literals I g